» Site Navigation
0 members and 748 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,104
Posts: 2,572,103
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
|
-
-
-
Hets are not morphs they carry (maybe) the genetic code for a morph but in them selves they are normal looking.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to kitedemon For This Useful Post:
-
idk about that.. het reds always have a very unique look if you ask me.. that looks like a lot of them that i have seen no doubt.. but personally i dont particulary like the het red stuff i think if you were going to get into a nice recessive project id get something a little more exciting.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to zach_24_90 For This Useful Post:
-
Actually...I believe "Het Red Axanthic" is a co dom. Why they want to confuse us...no idea. http://www.worldofballpythons.com/mo...-red-axanthic/
If you look at the cinnimon het red it is completely different than a cinni. It's a gargoyle http://www.worldofballpythons.com/mo...-red-axanthic/
Correct me if I'm wrong. I base my response solely on the interwebz...and they have done me wrong in the past
-
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to RoseyReps For This Useful Post:
angllady2 (08-08-2012),C&H Exotic Morphs (09-26-2012),dr del (08-08-2012),Rat160 (08-08-2012),Simple Man (08-08-2012),Wapadi (08-08-2012)
-
RoseyReps you are right about the Het Red.
I am not familiar with the reds but regardless she looks great.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PitOnTheProwl For This Useful Post:
Rat160 (08-08-2012),RoseyReps (08-08-2012)
-
Re: Het Red?
Looks like a het red axanthic...
-
The Following User Says Thank You to RobNJ For This Useful Post:
-
I never looked up het red axanthic. heterozygous is usually used to describe a un aspected allele.
John Berry writes," The het Red Axanthic is a proven line of genetic-black backs. The dominant homozygous form is the red-axanthic, a reddish coloured morph."
I don't see much red and maybe a black back but it looks too light to me, no red I can see. To me it looks like a normal with a darkish back and some wishful thinking.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to kitedemon For This Useful Post:
-
Re: Het Red?
Het red axanthics aren't reddish in color...
-
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to RobNJ For This Useful Post:
Rat160 (08-08-2012),Ridinandreptiles (10-28-2012),Simple Man (08-08-2012)
-
Like rob said. Het red axanthics are not red in color. The red axanthic (or super het red axanthic, if that's easier) start out like all axanthics, black and white. As they grow up the black turns a rusty red and the white turns a creamy yellow. Very awesome and under rated morph. This is my pastel het red axanthic and look what it does to pastels.


Lots of sweet blushing and the grey eye stripes are stellar.
To answer the OP, yes that looks like a het red but if you want a sure fire way to tell, look up a Canadian breeder named Corey Woods. He is where her red axanthics come from. Hope this helps.
Sent from my poo fone using Tapatalk
-
The Following User Says Thank You to interloc For This Useful Post:
-
Just going by the morph book the example is very red and dark. (fig 226 pp 116 designer-morphs J Berry) and looks very much like a black back with red undertones. I don't know it is all from J berrys book the example looks very very not normal. this is part of the issue with morphs there are so many that people say are one thing but they just look like a variation on normal. Then there is another from else where that look really different from normal and they are supposed to be the same morph. The example I have seen would never be mistaken for a normal.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to kitedemon For This Useful Post:
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|