Successful Landing on Mars!

[mr.spooky]

So how exactly is 0.5% such a huge threat to your solutions for poverty and hunger?




Why exactly should I believe you on any of this? The only thing you've proven is that your knowledge of the space program is meager at best, and you only care about scientific advancement if it directly benefits you.

As for my last statement....if you feel so strongly about NASA giving up their funding to help the poor and the needy, why don't you set a good example? Your snakes are even less important to humanity than you seem to think NASA is.

- - - Updated - - -



If you willfully choose to misunderstand my points because you have no real argument against them, it's no skin off my back.

uuuuuhhhhhhhh,,,,, the 0.5% translates to $18.4 billion as clearly stated. Im thinking that that would put a good dent (per year) in poverty and hunger, but I dunno.
Im willing to learn!!!! I previousaly ask, "so could someone tell me one thing that has physicaly came from the face of the moon that has benifited man"? Educate me please. I truly dont know anything about NASA or space exploration. Can you name a few?
Thanks
spooky

- - - Updated - - -

Just because the government lies, cheats, and steals, his point regarding their budget is invalid? On what planet does that make sense?

Just because something was not invented ON THE MOON doesn't mean it's not a product of the space exploration program. Do we need to build factories on the moon for manufacturing CAT scans before you can understand the connection?

Why was Neil Armstrong landing on the moon more important than this? Because they made movies about it, so it must be important? If they make a movie about the Curiosity rover would that make it important, too?

YOU are NUTS... Im done
spooky