» Site Navigation
1 members and 639 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,910
Threads: 249,115
Posts: 2,572,187
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
|
-
Registered User
Questionable Advertising or Misunderstanding of genetics?
My girlfriend and I are keeping an eye out for a few snakes we are looking to add to start our small breeding project. We are looking at local breeders due to the heat here in Texas and the ability that gives us to see the snakes in person.
One breeder I have found seems to be trying to advertise his snakes as more than what they are. He currently has ads up for pastel het pied in which the pairing was a Pied male and Pastel female. He never mentions poss het pied and his pricing is in line with 100% het pied snakes.
From my understanding the only way to have a 100% het pied (or any recessive gene) is if both parents are visual for that trait or for the snake to have been proven out. With hatchlings it is obviously not possible for the snake to be proven.
Am I right in being suspicious of this breeder by the way they are advertising and selling their snakes? Or is my understanding of the genetics off?
The breeder has a good rep on Fauna's BOI and I don't wish to mention names or accuse them of anything with out making sure that my understanding of genetics is right. Even then I don't want a witch hunt I just want to be informed and able to speak with the breeder as an informed and educated potential buyer.
Any feed back on this is greatly appreciated.
1.2 Normal (Houdini-M)(Prada-F)(Tantrum-F)
1.0 BumbleBee (Recon)
1.1 100% Het Pied (Hank-M)(Pym-F)
1.0 Butter (Jive A. Turkey)
1.1 100% Het Albino ( Albert-M)(Melanie-F)
0.1 Fire (Bindi)
0.1 Pinstripe (Penny)
1.0 Mojave (Baron Samedi)
0.1 Perfect Girlfriend (Jellyfish)
-
-
A Visual Recessive produces 100% Hets...
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
-
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to coldbloodaddict For This Useful Post:
aizkora (07-06-2012),angllady2 (07-06-2012),BallsUnlimited (07-06-2012),Don (07-06-2012)
-
A pastel x pied pairing would result in pastels het pied and normals het pied. Not poss hets bc one of the parents is a visual recessive.
Check out World of Ball Pythons.com's genetic calculator.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Mike41793 For This Useful Post:
-
They are listed correctly. All offspring of a visual parent will be 100% het. If both parents were visual, then there would be no hets since all of the offspring would be visible (homozygous).
When in doubt, plug the parents in the genetics wizard:
http://www.worldofballpythons.com/wizard/
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jabberwocky Dragons For This Useful Post:
aizkora (07-06-2012),Don (07-06-2012)
-
 Originally Posted by coldbloodaddict
A Visual Recessive produces 100% Hets...
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
Damn, you beat me lol
-
-
Registered User
Pied x pastel will produce 100% hets
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk 2
-
-
Pied x Pastel = het pieds, and pastel het pieds
 Originally Posted by reixox
BPs are like pokemon. you tell yourself you're not going to get sucked in. but some how you just gotta catch'em all.
-
-
And for good measure . . . pied to pastel = het pieds and pastel het pieds!
-Andrew Hall-
Good night Chesty, wherever you are....

-
-
Re: Questionable Advertising or Misunderstanding of genetics?
 Originally Posted by reixox
BPs are like pokemon. you tell yourself you're not going to get sucked in. but some how you just gotta catch'em all.
-
-
just in the very slight chance you mighta missed it pied x pastel = pastels 100% het pied an Normal 100% het pied
-
The Following User Says Thank You to BallsUnlimited For This Useful Post:
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|