Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 520

0 members and 520 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,113
Posts: 2,572,174
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan

View Poll Results: If you cross a spider x spider, what % off the offspring will be spider?

Voters
29. You may not vote on this poll
  • 50%

    10 34.48%
  • 75%

    15 51.72%
  • 67%

    3 10.34%
  • 25%

    1 3.45%
Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 63
  1. #51
    BPnet Senior Member gsarchie's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-23-2009
    Location
    'Murrica!
    Posts
    1,625
    Thanks
    647
    Thanked 706 Times in 433 Posts

    Found this...

    but they are both live bearing snakes, so not likely the case here. Either way, cool stuff.

    http://home.pcisys.net/~dlblanc/arti...enogenesis.php
    Bruce
    Top Shelf Herps
    1.0 Pastel (Gypsos)
    1.0 VPI Axanthic Pinstripe (B-Dub)
    1.0 Sable het Hypo (Flat Top)
    1.0 Lesser Platinum (Sean2)
    1.1 Lemonback (Einstein.Elsa)
    0.1 Pied (unnamed)
    0.1 Pinstripe het Hypo (Chopper)
    0.1 het VPI Axanthic (Vanilla)
    0.1 Spider 50% het VPI Axanthic (Serine)
    0.1 Hypo (Bella)
    0.1 het Hypo (Hooker)
    0.1 Cinnamon (Nutmeg)
    0.1 Normal (Jane)

  2. #52
    BPnet Royalty OhhWatALoser's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-28-2007
    Location
    Suburbs of Detroit
    Posts
    4,986
    Thanks
    530
    Thanked 2,721 Times in 1,477 Posts
    Images: 2

    Re: Proving Dominant Traits

    Quote Originally Posted by gsarchie View Post
    I have never heard of cases of parthenogenesis occuring in balls, or any snakes for that matter, and there is definitely no way that babies could get genetic material from dad only.
    there are a few cases of it happening in boas, bout all I know

  3. #53
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    11-13-2003
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,555
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 247 Times in 186 Posts
    Images: 28

    Re: Proving Dominant Traits

    Here is a Burmese python case:

    http://www.nature.com/hdy/journal/v9.../6800210a.html

    I regularly hear of isolated pet ball pythons laying eggs but it's usually someone without the skills/equipment to hatch the eggs and I don't know that any testing has been done if there ever where hatchlings. It’s just too easy to explain as retained sperm. Basically I think if it exists in ball pythons it isn't being found because we aren't looking for it. It would be very messy for the market. I know a breeder who thinks he might have seen it this year and he is considering selling off what was once a favored female ball python and all her offspring because he is worried it might happen again and doesn't want the uncertainty or to be associated with the unpredictable genetics.

    I certainly wouldn’t expect that it would be possible for the male to contribute the full set of genetic info but then again I wouldn’t think it would be possible that homozygous spiders never exist at any stage of reproduction. I’ve been hearing scattered reports of heterozygous co-dominant males to normal for the same mutation females producing apparent super/homozygous co-dominant offspring. I think the current industry explanation is a null allele situation on the females side. It would be interesting if we can get to the point where genetic testing is so cheap and available that some of these animals could be tested and compared to their parents to see for sure what is going on.

  4. #54
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    11-13-2003
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,555
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 247 Times in 186 Posts
    Images: 28

    Re: Proving Dominant Traits

    I really am quite ignorant of the python reproductive cycle. At what point does the egg cell become associated with the follicle? Is ovulation when the egg cell gets paired up with the follicle? The egg cell is already fertilized then, right? Maybe homozygous spider is homozygous lethal before ovulation so only non-homozygous spider fertilized egg cells are available to use up all the available follicles. True, there should only be 66% spider offspring from spider X spider with this scenario but 78% might not be that statistically significant an over represented in this sample size and maybe spider sperm have an advantage in fertilizing egg cells anyway.

  5. #55
    BPnet Royalty OhhWatALoser's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-28-2007
    Location
    Suburbs of Detroit
    Posts
    4,986
    Thanks
    530
    Thanked 2,721 Times in 1,477 Posts
    Images: 2

    Re: Proving Dominant Traits

    Quote Originally Posted by RandyRemington View Post
    I really am quite ignorant of the python reproductive cycle. At what point does the egg cell become associated with the follicle? Is ovulation when the egg cell gets paired up with the follicle? The egg cell is already fertilized then, right? Maybe homozygous spider is homozygous lethal before ovulation so only non-homozygous spider fertilized egg cells are available to use up all the available follicles. True, there should only be 66% spider offspring from spider X spider with this scenario but 78% might not be that statistically significant an over represented in this sample size and maybe spider sperm have an advantage in fertilizing egg cells anyway.
    if it works anything like humans and I'm remembering high school correctly.... ovulation is when the egg is released to meet with the sperm, so until that point nothing is determined.

  6. #56
    BPnet Senior Member WingedWolfPsion's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-27-2007
    Location
    Plattsmouth, NE
    Posts
    5,168
    Thanks
    124
    Thanked 1,785 Times in 1,134 Posts
    Images: 1
    I have a male spider that I bred last season, and I got 2 female and 1 male spider from one clutch of 6, and 1 female spider from the other (smaller) clutch.
    There was nothing unusual about the ratio or gender breakdown, and clearly male spiders can easily sire more male spiders.

    It's a most interesting puzzle!
    --Donna Fernstrom
    16.29 BPs in collection, 16.11 BP hatchlings
    Eclipse Exotics
    http://www.eclipseexotics.com/
    Author Website
    http://donnafernstrom.com
    Follow my Twitters: WingedWolfPsion, EclipseMeta, and EclipseExotics

  7. #57
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    08-31-2011
    Posts
    649
    Thanks
    193
    Thanked 428 Times in 263 Posts
    Images: 21

    Re: Proving Dominant Traits

    Quote Originally Posted by gsarchie View Post
    but they are both live bearing snakes, so not likely the case here. Either way, cool stuff.

    http://home.pcisys.net/~dlblanc/arti...enogenesis.php
    Excellent article!

    As this sort of thing has been found in egg-laying lizards and birds, it seems likely to be able to occur in egg-laying snakes.

    Quote Originally Posted by RandyRemington View Post
    I really am quite ignorant of the python reproductive cycle. At what point does the egg cell become associated with the follicle? Is ovulation when the egg cell gets paired up with the follicle? The egg cell is already fertilized then, right? Maybe homozygous spider is homozygous lethal before ovulation so only non-homozygous spider fertilized egg cells are available to use up all the available follicles. True, there should only be 66% spider offspring from spider X spider with this scenario but 78% might not be that statistically significant an over represented in this sample size and maybe spider sperm have an advantage in fertilizing egg cells anyway.
    A single egg cell develops inside each follicle in the ovary. Ovulation occurs when the egg cell leaves the follicle. Fertilization occurs after ovulation.

    Male spider x female normal produces both spider and normal offspring. So spider sperm can get to the eggs. But are there fewer spider offspring from this sort of mating than from a normal male x female spider mating? Anyone collected any statistics? For that matter has anyone collected statistics to see if there are the same, fewer or more spiders than normals from such matings? If there are statistically less than 50% spiders from spider x normal matings, it would be consistent with the lethal homozygous spider theory.
    Last edited by paulh; 06-13-2012 at 12:07 PM.

  8. #58
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    08-31-2011
    Posts
    649
    Thanks
    193
    Thanked 428 Times in 263 Posts
    Images: 21

    Re: Proving Dominant Traits

    Quote Originally Posted by RandyRemington View Post
    Paul, so after 25 33% chance possible homozygous animals in a row failed to prove did the breeder decide it's a homozygous lethal mutation? Did ya'll notice about 1/4 bad eggs from the het X het breedings or any infertile possible homozygous animals?
    Yes, he decided crested was lethal when homozygous. The odds of getting that string of failures by chance was just too small. He also found that there were fewer crested zebra finches than normals from a crested x normal mating. This was when the results of many matings were totaled.

    Part of what I did was to check the finch nests for eggs and nestlings. A clutch averaged 6 eggs. Three babies leaving the nest was considered good results. The other eggs were either infertile or dead embryos. Entire clutches might be abandoned. An egg was approximately 1/4 inch long, so hatchlings were tiny. Dead hatchlings were not recorded. They were lost in the nest material or litter on the cage floor. So we could not zero in on the stage of homozygous crested death. Sometime before feathering out was our best guess, which leaves plenty of time. Sterility in adults did not seem much of a problem.

  9. #59
    BPnet Senior Member WingedWolfPsion's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-27-2007
    Location
    Plattsmouth, NE
    Posts
    5,168
    Thanks
    124
    Thanked 1,785 Times in 1,134 Posts
    Images: 1
    Paul, while I'm a small breeder, and have produced only a few spider clutches so far, the ratio of spider to normal has been extremely typical--just the same as ratios in lesser and mojave clutches. Sometimes a few more, sometimes less, but usually about the same number of morphs and normals.

    I work a lot with the very similar woma mutation, and ratios there are also typical.

    This means little, because I know from personal experience how dramatically a single clutch can sway from the average--I got 11 pastels and 2 normals out of a 13 egg clutch from a pastel X normal breeding, once, lol.
    --Donna Fernstrom
    16.29 BPs in collection, 16.11 BP hatchlings
    Eclipse Exotics
    http://www.eclipseexotics.com/
    Author Website
    http://donnafernstrom.com
    Follow my Twitters: WingedWolfPsion, EclipseMeta, and EclipseExotics

  10. #60
    Registered User PsychD_Student's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-14-2012
    Location
    A, A
    Posts
    133
    Thanks
    24
    Thanked 13 Times in 11 Posts

    Cool Re: Proving Dominant Traits

    This website will further explain, with different examples, the reason behind these morphs showing more characteristics of incomplete dominance genetics than co-dominant genetics.

    http://www.hobart.k12.in.us/jkousen/...y/inccodom.htm

    These are short quizes! Haha

    http://www.ksu.edu/biology/pob/genetics/incom.htm

    http://sciencespot.net/Media/gen_spbobincdom.pdf

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1