Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 605

1 members and 604 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,112
Posts: 2,572,158
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Threaded View

  1. #5
    BPnet Senior Member WingedWolfPsion's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-27-2007
    Location
    Plattsmouth, NE
    Posts
    5,168
    Thanks
    124
    Thanked 1,785 Times in 1,134 Posts
    Images: 1
    She is definitely, at least, a lesser-woma. The pastel lesser-womas I saw did not have a lot of fading and blushing, actually--that's why I am still not sure. Only someone who has actually seen some examples of this combination might be able to clue me in on what to look for, because I simply couldn't tell them apart.

    Here is a photo of her sire:


    Here is what her sire looked like as a hatchling:


    She's actually not nearly as light as he was, but does that necessarily mean she doesn't carry the pastel gene? What if it, for some reason, had a darkening instead of lightening effect...at least on the hatchling, if not the adult?
    It's also possible that the pastel gene could have disrupted the Woma pattern, which is why she has so many markings where a woma would not.
    Last edited by WingedWolfPsion; 06-10-2012 at 09:02 PM.
    --Donna Fernstrom
    16.29 BPs in collection, 16.11 BP hatchlings
    Eclipse Exotics
    http://www.eclipseexotics.com/
    Author Website
    http://donnafernstrom.com
    Follow my Twitters: WingedWolfPsion, EclipseMeta, and EclipseExotics

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1