Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,299

1 members and 1,298 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,917
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,203
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Necbov
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Threaded View

  1. #16
    BPnet Veteran Jabberwocky Dragons's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-17-2012
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    404
    Thanks
    69
    Thanked 276 Times in 158 Posts
    Images: 9

    Re: USDA seeks change to regulate Internet and retail pet sales

    Quote Originally Posted by WingedWolfPsion View Post
    Reptiles have always been exempt from USDA licensing, so is there any reason to think this would change that?
    Burmese Pythons, African Rock Pythons, and Yellow Anacondas have always been exempt from Lacy Act requirements (236 years exempt to be exact), any reason to think that would have been changed a few months ago? The very common boa constrictors and 4 other species would have joined them in illegality if USARK and others had not fought so hard. Some people do not want exotic pet ownership to exist and over regulation is one of the best ways to stifle and eventually eliminate any form of commerce. The USDA, like the Lacey Act, is just another tool in the gov't toolbox. The Gibson Guitar company is a prime example of commerce suppression through over-regulation and their story provides a very possibly real glimpse into exotic animal keepers' futures.
    Last edited by Jabberwocky Dragons; 05-14-2012 at 11:49 AM.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jabberwocky Dragons For This Useful Post:

    Don (05-14-2012),Dragoon (05-14-2012),minguss (05-15-2012)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1