Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 630

0 members and 630 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,106
Posts: 2,572,115
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Threaded View

  1. #7
    Telling it like it is! Stewart_Reptiles's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-28-2006
    Posts
    24,845
    Thanks
    6,116
    Thanked 20,811 Times in 9,584 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images: 6
    Yes I have heard of it as a temporary measure for an animal near death however no way should it be done on an animal for 18 months.

    The more this is done the more the animal is being stressed the less likely he is to eat on his own.

    There are different case scenario here.

    #1/ The animal was never properly started and than subjected to additional stress cause by husbandry issues leading to long term refusal.

    #2/ Failure to thrive

    In either cases the animal should have been assisted or force-fed until he naturally started eating on it's own it can take time but it usually works, in the rare cases it doesn't and the animal fails to thrive the best decision is to have the animal put down.

    The tube feeding is not accomplishing anything with that animal it's just merely maintaining it alive but a real poor quality of life in my opinion.
    Deborah Stewart


  2. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Stewart_Reptiles For This Useful Post:

    Aes_Sidhe (05-06-2012),Annarose15 (06-08-2012),apple2 (06-08-2012),dr del (05-06-2012),heathers*bps (06-08-2012),Skittles1101 (05-06-2012),The Serpent Merchant (05-06-2012),tjohnson722 (05-06-2012)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1