» Site Navigation
0 members and 864 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 76,073
Threads: 249,220
Posts: 2,572,811
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
|
-
Re: Has desert female breeding got anywhere?
 Originally Posted by jinx667
Adding genes does not appear to help.
This to me is one of the worst indicators of failure in them. Hope I'm wrong, I like some of you will still give it a try eventually.
-
-
Re: Has desert female breeding got anywhere?
 Originally Posted by Emilio
This to me is one of the worst indicators of failure in them.
Why would that make any difference...and I'm truly curious to your thoughts, not being combative. Spiders still wobble when combined with other mutations. The thought process behind mutations essentially being "fixed" by entirely separate mutations is baffling to me...but then again, I don't claim to be well versed in genetic mutations or how they work.
-
-
Registered User
Re: Has desert female breeding got anywhere?
Why would that make any difference...and I'm truly curious to your thoughts, not being combative. Spiders still wobble when combined with other mutations. The thought process behind mutations essentially being "fixed" by entirely separate mutations is baffling to me...but then again, I don't claim to be well versed in genetic mutations or how they work.
You are correct...you can not fix a morph just because you mix that morph...I am sure someone will correct me if I am wrong...
For example...Spider and Sable proven to be fatal...if you were to combine an extreme morph....lets say a Spider Pin Lesser Ghost Pastel to a Sable Mojave Yellow Belly Orange Dream and in that clutch any baby that had the Spider Sable gene in the same baby it would not make it....when those two morphs cross the same path results will be the same no matter how many other morphs are present.
So you can't solve the problem of Desert females throwing infertile eggs just because its crossed into other genes....that gene still plays a roll....
Anyone can correct me if I am wrong...I know I have been wrong before....
Travis
Lair of Dragons
To many Ball Python morphs to list but don't own enough......YET!
-
-
Re: Has desert female breeding got anywhere?
Hi,
There have been some odd anomalies reported at NERD - like a living sable spider and a surviving pearl.
I haven't heard anthing more about them though so I don't know what the long term result was.
Derek
7 adult Royals (2.5), 1.0 COS Pastel, 1.0 Enchi, 1.1 Lesser platty Royal python, 1.1 Black pastel Royal python, 0.1 Blue eyed leucistic ( Super lesser), 0.1 Piebald Royal python, 1.0 Sinaloan milk snake 1.0 crested gecko and 1 bad case of ETS. no wife, no surprise.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to dr del For This Useful Post:
-
Re: Has desert female breeding got anywhere?
 Originally Posted by dr del
Hi,
There have been some odd anomalies reported at NERD - like a living sable spider and a surviving pearl.
I haven't heard anthing more about them though so I don't know what the long term result was.
At least with the Pearl, isn't that thing so neuro that maybe it should not be alive?
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Royal Hijinx For This Useful Post:
-
Re: Has desert female breeding got anywhere?
 Originally Posted by RobNJ
Why would that make any difference...and I'm truly curious to your thoughts, not being combative. Spiders still wobble when combined with other mutations. The thought process behind mutations essentially being "fixed" by entirely separate mutations is baffling to me...but then again, I don't claim to be well versed in genetic mutations or how they work.
I was told by a big breeder recently that one of the main problems with the desert gene is them feeding consistently. My thoughts are simple, you mix Spiders into deserts and maybe just maybe you get an animal that feed's and breed's better. In my opinion Spiders are the best feeding and breeding ball pythons hands down, I'm thinking maybe just maybe they can offset some of the desert's weaknesses.
Last edited by Emilio; 05-03-2012 at 09:25 PM.
-
-
Re: Has desert female breeding got anywhere?
 Originally Posted by Emilio
I was told by a big breeder recently that one of the main problems with the desert gene is them feeding consistently. My thoughts are simple, you mix Spiders into deserts and maybe just maybe you get an animal that feed's and breed's better. In my opinion Spiders are the best feeding and breeding ball pythons hands down, I'm thinking maybe just maybe they can offset some of the desert's weaknesses.
I wondered the same thing about the sub-saharan giants.
Derek
7 adult Royals (2.5), 1.0 COS Pastel, 1.0 Enchi, 1.1 Lesser platty Royal python, 1.1 Black pastel Royal python, 0.1 Blue eyed leucistic ( Super lesser), 0.1 Piebald Royal python, 1.0 Sinaloan milk snake 1.0 crested gecko and 1 bad case of ETS. no wife, no surprise.
-
-
Re: Has desert female breeding got anywhere?
 Originally Posted by dr del
I wondered the same thing about the sub-saharan giants. 
I'm in full agreement with you on this idea also.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|