Quote Originally Posted by paulh View Post
1. The unproven dominant mutants are present only as mutant/normal gene pairs. There was no way to choose a gene pair made up of two copies of those genes.
You can still use the original calc to do this. I thought listing homozygous forms of dominant morphs might be confusing for the newcomers, since they don't exist publicly yet. I figured it was best to leave them out. The classic calc does not restrict you at all. You can even do names not in the database.

Quote Originally Posted by paulh View Post
2. Compatible mutants (alleles) were scattered instead of grouped. Lesser platinum (produced by a lesser gene paired with a normal gene) is in the single gene section while blue-eyed leucistic (produced by a lesser gene paired with a mojave gene) is in the double gene section. IMO, the scattering is inconvenient. It can also be confusing because most of the entries in the double gene section are produced by the action of two gene pairs.
Single gene lists all the morphs with their heterozygous and homozygous forms (besides dominant). Double gene lists all combos with 2 different genes making them up. triple gene lists combos with 3 different genes making them up and quad+ does everything else. The mojave lesser BEL is in the double gene section because it has two different morphs involved with it. I'm not quite sure how else you would want to see them organized. Lemme know what you had in mind.

Quote Originally Posted by paulh View Post
3. According to the calculator,
Male: Blue Eye'd Leucistic (L/Mo)
Female: Butter Daddy
Percent Fraction Traits
25% 1/4 Daddy Gene, Mojave
25% 1/4 Blue Eye'd Leucistic (B/Mo)
25% 1/4 Platinum
25% 1/4 Blue Eye'd Leucistic
Several genotypes produce a blue-eyed leucistic phenotype. It would help a newbie if the two genes producing the second blue-eyed leucistic progeny were identified.
The only BEL that is not identified is the Lesser and Butter BELs. The rest are. I think most people are aware that super lesser or super butters are BEL and I see no reason to differentiate between butters and lessers. So thats what I came up with.

Quote Originally Posted by paulh View Post
By the way, I do not follow the logic for classifying the daddy gene as a dominant mutant.
Link I posted in at the top, clutch 76 on RDR's website, he bred a pair of platinums together. which you have 3 possibilities, referring to the calc...


The baby was not a BEL or a platinum, just a baby that looked like a heterozygous daddy gene.