Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 663

0 members and 663 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,916
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,199
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Wilson1885
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 32
  1. #11
    BPnet Veteran Bill T's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-13-2011
    Location
    Northern Minnesota
    Posts
    248
    Thanks
    25
    Thanked 73 Times in 52 Posts
    I cant find any problems with it. Its accurate and loads quickly. Ausome tool. Thank you for making it.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Bill T For This Useful Post:

    OhhWatALoser (04-09-2012)

  3. #12
    BPnet Veteran Rage Beard Reptiles's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-06-2012
    Location
    North DFW, Tx
    Posts
    617
    Thanks
    229
    Thanked 674 Times in 265 Posts
    Images: 8

    Lightbulb

    AWESOME AWESOME AWESOME! Helping me out with my breeding plans so much!

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Rage Beard Reptiles For This Useful Post:

    OhhWatALoser (04-09-2012)

  5. #13
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    08-31-2011
    Posts
    649
    Thanks
    193
    Thanked 428 Times in 263 Posts
    Images: 21

    Re: New Genetics Calc

    Others have already mentioned things to like about the new OWAL genetics calculator. I like them, too. Nobody mentioned the unproven dominant category, which was a feature that I liked.

    IMO, the calculator is not perfect. I thought the genotypes and phenotypes should be better differentiated. Here are some other things I did not like:

    1. The unproven dominant mutants are present only as mutant/normal gene pairs. There was no way to choose a gene pair made up of two copies of those genes.

    2. Compatible mutants (alleles) were scattered instead of grouped. Lesser platinum (produced by a lesser gene paired with a normal gene) is in the single gene section while blue-eyed leucistic (produced by a lesser gene paired with a mojave gene) is in the double gene section. IMO, the scattering is inconvenient. It can also be confusing because most of the entries in the double gene section are produced by the action of two gene pairs.

    3. According to the calculator,
    Male: Blue Eye'd Leucistic (L/Mo)
    Female: Butter Daddy
    Percent Fraction Traits
    25% 1/4 Daddy Gene, Mojave
    25% 1/4 Blue Eye'd Leucistic (B/Mo)
    25% 1/4 Platinum
    25% 1/4 Blue Eye'd Leucistic
    Several genotypes produce a blue-eyed leucistic phenotype. It would help a newbie if the two genes producing the second blue-eyed leucistic progeny were identified.

    By the way, I do not follow the logic for classifying the daddy gene as a dominant mutant.
    Last edited by paulh; 04-10-2012 at 12:23 AM.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to paulh For This Useful Post:

    OhhWatALoser (04-10-2012)

  7. #14
    BPnet Veteran C&H Exotic Morphs's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-23-2011
    Location
    Maricopa, AZ
    Posts
    1,424
    Thanks
    648
    Thanked 645 Times in 538 Posts
    I really like it and think you have done an excellent job!

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to C&H Exotic Morphs For This Useful Post:

    OhhWatALoser (04-10-2012)

  9. #15
    BPnet Veteran Scubaf250's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-03-2011
    Posts
    476
    Thanks
    35
    Thanked 45 Times in 39 Posts
    Awesome!! I'm going to have to break out my computer though... It's a little hard on an iPhone haha


    Send in your two cents!
    Http://Yourtwocentsworth.com

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Scubaf250 For This Useful Post:

    OhhWatALoser (04-10-2012)

  11. #16
    BPnet Royalty Mike41793's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-15-2011
    Posts
    16,925
    Thanks
    6,667
    Thanked 7,981 Times in 5,584 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Scubaf250 View Post
    Awesome!! I'm going to have to break out my computer though... It's a little hard on an iPhone haha


    Send in your two cents!
    Http://Yourtwocentsworth.com
    x2
    Im gunna wait til i get home to do it on my laptop. Im not gettin the full effect on the iphone lol
    1.0 normal bp

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Mike41793 For This Useful Post:

    OhhWatALoser (04-10-2012)

  13. #17
    BPnet Royalty OhhWatALoser's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-28-2007
    Location
    Suburbs of Detroit
    Posts
    4,986
    Thanks
    530
    Thanked 2,721 Times in 1,477 Posts
    Images: 2

    Re: New Genetics Calc

    Quote Originally Posted by paulh View Post
    1. The unproven dominant mutants are present only as mutant/normal gene pairs. There was no way to choose a gene pair made up of two copies of those genes.
    You can still use the original calc to do this. I thought listing homozygous forms of dominant morphs might be confusing for the newcomers, since they don't exist publicly yet. I figured it was best to leave them out. The classic calc does not restrict you at all. You can even do names not in the database.

    Quote Originally Posted by paulh View Post
    2. Compatible mutants (alleles) were scattered instead of grouped. Lesser platinum (produced by a lesser gene paired with a normal gene) is in the single gene section while blue-eyed leucistic (produced by a lesser gene paired with a mojave gene) is in the double gene section. IMO, the scattering is inconvenient. It can also be confusing because most of the entries in the double gene section are produced by the action of two gene pairs.
    Single gene lists all the morphs with their heterozygous and homozygous forms (besides dominant). Double gene lists all combos with 2 different genes making them up. triple gene lists combos with 3 different genes making them up and quad+ does everything else. The mojave lesser BEL is in the double gene section because it has two different morphs involved with it. I'm not quite sure how else you would want to see them organized. Lemme know what you had in mind.

    Quote Originally Posted by paulh View Post
    3. According to the calculator,
    Male: Blue Eye'd Leucistic (L/Mo)
    Female: Butter Daddy
    Percent Fraction Traits
    25% 1/4 Daddy Gene, Mojave
    25% 1/4 Blue Eye'd Leucistic (B/Mo)
    25% 1/4 Platinum
    25% 1/4 Blue Eye'd Leucistic
    Several genotypes produce a blue-eyed leucistic phenotype. It would help a newbie if the two genes producing the second blue-eyed leucistic progeny were identified.
    The only BEL that is not identified is the Lesser and Butter BELs. The rest are. I think most people are aware that super lesser or super butters are BEL and I see no reason to differentiate between butters and lessers. So thats what I came up with.

    Quote Originally Posted by paulh View Post
    By the way, I do not follow the logic for classifying the daddy gene as a dominant mutant.
    Link I posted in at the top, clutch 76 on RDR's website, he bred a pair of platinums together. which you have 3 possibilities, referring to the calc...


    The baby was not a BEL or a platinum, just a baby that looked like a heterozygous daddy gene.

  14. #18
    BPnet Royalty OhhWatALoser's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-28-2007
    Location
    Suburbs of Detroit
    Posts
    4,986
    Thanks
    530
    Thanked 2,721 Times in 1,477 Posts
    Images: 2

    Re: New Genetics Calc

    Quote Originally Posted by Scubaf250 View Post
    Awesome!! I'm going to have to break out my computer though... It's a little hard on an iPhone haha


    Send in your two cents!
    Http://Yourtwocentsworth.com
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike41793 View Post
    x2
    Im gunna wait til i get home to do it on my laptop. Im not gettin the full effect on the iphone lol
    yea the only mobile browser I found the list "works" on is opera because opera ignores the height and just lists the entire list, making the page freaking huge.

    Classic calc still works as long as your browser supports javascript and click to copy will work as long as it supports flash.

  15. #19
    BPnet Veteran Scubaf250's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-03-2011
    Posts
    476
    Thanks
    35
    Thanked 45 Times in 39 Posts


    It works great in safari on the iPhone, it's just not as easy to click individual genes as it would be with a mouse, probably because my fingers are too big hahaha!

    Can't wait till you get all the pictures together for it! =D



    Send in your two cents!
    Http://Yourtwocentsworth.com

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Scubaf250 For This Useful Post:

    OhhWatALoser (04-10-2012)

  17. #20
    BPnet Royalty OhhWatALoser's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-28-2007
    Location
    Suburbs of Detroit
    Posts
    4,986
    Thanks
    530
    Thanked 2,721 Times in 1,477 Posts
    Images: 2

    Re: New Genetics Calc

    Quote Originally Posted by Scubaf250 View Post
    It works great in safari on the iPhone, it's just not as easy to click individual genes as it would be with a mouse, probably because my fingers are too big hahaha!

    Can't wait till you get all the pictures together for it! =D
    good to know, thanks

    Yea there been very little response with the pictures...

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1