I know one loophole. If it is legal to breed them within the state, people could still breed them, and since they are so prolific, only incubate a few eggs. Then they would be able to sell them easier than trying to sell a whole clutch in the state.
Also, a few people would illegally transport the newest morphs over state borders, spreading the morphs to new states. Once they have a single animal (like albino), to breed from, they could make more in the next state. After a while it would be too hard to track back inheritance to the single illegally-transported animal.
Incubating select eggs probably isn't the best solution. First of all, making less product doesn't help the business owners relying on out-of-state sales at all. It's limiting your product on top of limiting the market. I think the key to solving that would just be to breed less often so you don't end up with too much surplus. Plus, if you're working with some higher-end recessive morphs, especially paired with hets, you don't want to risk discarding the the morphs and ending up with all hets.

I like to think the people working on new morphs will be responsible enough to abide by the law and keep their snakes within state. Granted, where they go after sale is out of their control, but.

Here is a copy of how the final ruling is worded.

http://www.mnherpsoc.com/sites/defau...s-Wildlife.pdf

SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) is amending its
regulations under the Lacey Act to add
Python molurus (which includes
Burmese python Python molurus
bivittatus and Indian python Python
molurus molurus), Northern African
python (Python sebae), Southern
African python (Python natalensis), and
yellow anaconda (Eunectes notaeus) to
the list of injurious reptiles.
Okay, so the Ceylonese is still fair game. I may just have to go that route if the ban isn't lifted in a few years.