Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 661

0 members and 661 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,117
Posts: 2,572,191
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    08-21-2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    181
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 22 Times in 17 Posts

    15% IS the Golden Rule

    I found this really cool study published in Physiology & Behavior about feeding patters and satiety in two snake species - Yellow Anacondas and Ball Pythons.

    I would love to post it here, but don't know how (or if I'm allowed to).

    Basically, the researchers confirm what others have said for BP's - 10-15% is the best size.

    Here's the abstract.

    Satiety has been studied extensively in mammals, birds and fish but very little information exists on reptiles.
    Here we investigate time-dependent satiation in two species of constricting snakes, ball pythons (Python
    regius) and yellow anacondas (Eunectes notaeus). Satiation was shown to depend on both fasting time and prey
    size. In the ball pythons fed with mice of a relative prey mass RPM (mass of the prey/mass of the snakeŚ100)
    of 15%, we observed a satiety response that developed between 6 and 12 h after feeding, but after 24 h pythons
    regained their appetite. With an RPM of 10% the pythons kept eating throughout the experiment. The
    anacondas showed a non-significant tendency for satiety to develop between 6 and 12 h after ingesting a prey
    of 20% RPM. Unlike pythons, anacondas remained satiated after 24 h. Handling time (from strike until prey
    swallowed) increased with RPM. We also found a significant decrease in handling time between the first and
    the second prey and a positive correlation between handling time and the mass of the snake.
    And a line from the Results section.

    On average food acceptance frequency
    decreased from 89%±7 to 43%±24, when RPM was increased from
    10 to 15.
    It seems like 15% is the number to aim for.

  2. #2
    BPnet Veteran The Serpent Merchant's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-15-2011
    Location
    Orlando, Florida
    Posts
    8,193
    Thanks
    1,504
    Thanked 3,300 Times in 2,344 Posts
    Yep most of us do in fact know what we are doing lol

    Thanks for posting this it is nice to have some conframation.
    ~Aaron

    0.1 Pastel 100% Het Clown Ball Python (Hestia)
    1.0 Coastal/Jungle Carpet Python (Shagrath)
    0.1 Dumeril's Boa (Nergal)

    0.1 Bearded Dragon (Gaius)

    1.0 Siberian Husky (Picard)
    0.1 German Shepherd/Lab Mix (Jadzia)

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to The Serpent Merchant For This Useful Post:

    snakesRkewl (02-03-2012)

  4. #3
    BPnet Lifer MrLang's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-13-2011
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    2,530
    Thanks
    726
    Thanked 1,456 Times in 831 Posts
    Images: 8
    That reads to me like you should feed picky eaters small meals more frequently, yes? Haven't seen that one here but then again I haven't read many of the fasting snake threads yet as my 2 juveniles are ravenous...
    Dreamtime Exotics -- Check it out!
    Ball Pythons, Monitors, Saltwater Reef, Fancy Rats, Ferrets

  5. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    08-21-2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    181
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 22 Times in 17 Posts

    What I could Tell

    The paper doesn't really say much about food preference or feeding strategy.

    My guess would be to feed picky eaters larger meals because if they're difficult to feed, you could feed them less frequently.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1