95% of their speech says "Well, WE don't want to be affected." not "pet owners shouldn't have to give up their pets".

I'm happy to see them point out all the issues with the ban, with the study the HSUS/FL is using to push the ban... but less happy to see them basically stating they'd be happy if provisions are made so that AZA groups will not be affected, even if the general public still are fully affected.