Quote Originally Posted by OhhWatALoser View Post
There are no links, just talk to brian directly, he hatched something like 27 pins from the same snake. Its the only one I know of. If there was defects it wouldn't be dominant. There are none avaliable. All it means is you have a pin looking animal that always passes a pin gene, why does everyone thing this is so different. Super pastels always pass a pastel gene, super pins always pass a pin gene. Difference is pin does look different in either form, so its classfied as dominant. Since they dont look different, its not really a project worth going after, all the work time and resources and you get an animal that looks exactly the same. Don't plan on seeing many of them
Quote Originally Posted by snakesRkewl View Post
Actually a super pin or a super spider would speed up the decline in value of those morphs.
IF there was such a thing as a super pin or super spider, already two of the most produced morphs out there, the market for those two morphs would crash even further than it already has.
I would think anyone producing spider combos and pinstripe combos would not want a homozygous version proven
I understand your theory there and it makes sense. Only thing I can say there is that since they are such a common morph, their value is already decreasing every second. So granted their value would take a big hit but that's coming regardless. So even if they end up costing what Pastels are at now, their combos are still valuable and even a $100 pin is worth more than a $30 normal. But I am not trying to change your mind, you make a great point and I respect it completely.