Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 594

1 members and 593 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,916
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,200
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Wilson1885
Results 1 to 10 of 67

Threaded View

  1. #25
    BPnet Lifer Skiploder's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-03-2007
    Location
    Under a pile of wood.
    Posts
    3,580
    Thanks
    113
    Thanked 3,727 Times in 1,257 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: U.S. set to approve python ban

    Quote Originally Posted by Foschi Exotic Serpents View Post
    The reply I got after sending my letters last week... I wonder how many other of our reps had absolutely no idea that this was going on??

    **

    Thank you for contacting me concerning the Lacey Act. I appreciate knowing your thoughts on this matter.

    The Lacey Act was signed into law in 1900. It was the first federal law designed to protect wildlife and is administered by the Departments of Interior, Commerce, and Agriculture (USDA). Over the past century, the law has been amended several times to expand protection to a broader range of flora and fauna, and to control the potentially dangerous introduction of non-native species.

    Most recently, the bill was amended by the 2008 Farm Bill to prohibit the import of illegally logged timber and timber products. This amendment included language from the Combat Illegal Logging Act of 2007, which was written to help curb illegal logging practices abroad by eliminating offenders’ access to the U.S. market.

    I appreciate your concerns regarding the scope of the Lacey Act. Although no legislation has been introduced that would amend or defund the Lacey Act, I will keep your views in mind in case the matter is considered by the Senate in the future.

    Again, thank you for your message. Please feel free to stay in touch on issues of importance to you.
    Sincerely,
    Richard J. Durbin
    United States Senator

    Monica:

    Durbin the Richard is an idiot.

    One of his aides did a crappy job of reading your inquiry.

    This is his "stance" on constrictors and the Lacey Act:

    http://amazon-alliance.com/forums/in...ic=1288.0;wap2

    http://www.usark.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&p=464
    Last edited by Skiploder; 01-18-2012 at 10:07 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1