Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 552

2 members and 550 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,916
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,200
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Wilson1885
Results 1 to 10 of 67

Threaded View

  1. #11
    BPnet Veteran Kinra's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-05-2011
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    3,706
    Thanks
    1,170
    Thanked 1,288 Times in 1,090 Posts
    Images: 6

    Re: U.S. set to approve python ban

    Quote Originally Posted by Driver View Post
    IF this is approved then it wouldn't take effect immediately they would set a date for it to take effect in the future.
    That is true, but as an owner of the banned species I don't like it. I will be forced to choose between my pets or breaking the law if I ever want to move to a different state.

    Quote Originally Posted by WarriorPrincess90 View Post
    What does this mean for people who already own these species? Will they be forced to get rid of them, or potentially be persecuted?
    It basically means you can't legally move with them out of state. This bill only bans the interstate transport of them.

    Quote Originally Posted by Driver View Post
    Alot of people blame pet owners that let their snakes go when they got to big for the snakes in the everglades but there is a lot of research out that that doesn't support this. For one snakes that have been raised in captivity and only know how to eat what is dropped into their container and has grown that big wouldn't be able to survive in the wild for very long. Granite they would survive for a while but not long enough to start a population. They wouldn't be able to hunt as well to stay alive they are too used to be handed food. Now im not saying that some wouldnt survive but not enough to reproduce and to the number we have today.
    While I don't believe the problem is from released pets, I don't entirely believe this argument. Snakes are more primitive than dogs or cats and they do just fine when dumped by their owners. I think released snakes would be able to feed themselves. They don't lose those instincts no matter how long we have been keeping them as pets and that is part of why some people don't understand why we keep them.
    Last edited by Kinra; 01-17-2012 at 12:39 AM.
    Rebecca
    facebook ~ google+
    www.rawreptiles.com ~ RAW Reptiles on Facebook
    Snakes
    Ball Pythons ~ Hypo Jungle Boas ~ Bredlis ~ Carpet Pythons
    Lizards
    Crested Geckos ~ Chahouas ~ Bearded Dragon
    Furry Friends
    1.0 Black Lab (Orion)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1