Quote Originally Posted by Rhasputin View Post
Just because it was eating, doesn't mean it wasn't starving. If it was eating, and not growing that is by definition starving. . . Egapal explained it very clearly.
It WAS NOT GROWING, it's body was STARVING FOR NUTRITION. And it would have DIED no matter what.

It's greatly disturbing to me that you don't understand this.
Have you not looked at the pictures? It grew a considerable ammount in just four days. It continued to grow and do well, but not enough to where I felt it was better to keep it versus feeding it off. You do not know that it would have died no matter what and neither do I. Why? Because it was a feeder animal and was used for it's intended purpose. It grew steadily, yet slowly, but not fast enough for my comfort. Putting words in BIG BOLD LETTERS TOGETHER just lends to the fact that you still have no basis for your arguement so you try to make yourself sound more important by becoming louder. I have done nothing but respect and consider your opinion this entire time, wish I could say the same for some others.

Either way all, it has been made into poo but by some peoples account is probably still suffering. What I would like to know is how you all feel about my dwarf leopard gecko Itzy Bitzy Ditzy? lol