» Site Navigation
0 members and 474 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 76,073
Threads: 249,220
Posts: 2,572,808
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
|
-
Re: Breeding Bumble Bee To Bumble Bee
 Originally Posted by ReptilesK2
Genetic Wizard 3.0 calculations by

Does anyone know why 2 bumblebee's are listed in the outcome of this pairing? Looks like a 25% and 12.5% chance. May just be a glitch
-
-
Re: Breeding Bumble Bee To Bumble Bee
 Originally Posted by joebad976
Does anyone know why 2 bumblebee's are listed in the outcome of this pairing? Looks like a 25% and 12.5% chance. May just be a glitch
My guess is that he(WOBP.com Mod) replaced the super spider with bumble bee. IMO, the odds on that pairing look off all together. Dur to the potential of the super spider being lethal I suggest you just pick another animal to pair with your bumblebee. Why try and make a bunch of bees when you can make a whole handful of different morphs with a different 2 gene animal involved. Just saying.
-
-
Registered User
Re: Breeding Bumble Bee To Bumble Bee
Any tips you can give on telling if an axanthic hatchling is a quality version of the breed?
-
-
Re: Breeding Bumble Bee To Bumble Bee
 Originally Posted by twistedtails
My guess is that he(WOBP.com Mod) replaced the super spider with bumble bee. IMO, the odds on that pairing look off all together. Dur to the potential of the super spider being lethal I suggest you just pick another animal to pair with your bumblebee. Why try and make a bunch of bees when you can make a whole handful of different morphs with a different 2 gene animal involved. Just saying.
It's not a "super spider" as spider is a dominant gene. You don't say super pinstripe or super normal either ... The calculator has those results because in a punnet square, you have difference places where the bee pops up and they just didn't get combined.
-
-
Re: Breeding Bumble Bee To Bumble Bee
There is no super spider. It is a Dominate trait. Therefore the super cannot be lethal as it simply does not exsist.
Wanna hear it from the EvilmorphGod himself?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fhnR...feature=relmfu
1:00 is where he states it. I would have to recommend that everyone who plans to breed morphs check out Part 1 &2. Actually I recommend watching all of Raphy's vids. Tons of great info!
Selective Buying + Selective Breeding = Select Results!
-
The Following User Says Thank You to AGoldReptiles For This Useful Post:
Skittles1101 (12-02-2011)
-
Re: Breeding Bumble Bee To Bumble Bee
 Originally Posted by AGoldReptiles
There is no super spider. It is a Dominate trait. Therefore the super cannot be lethal as it simply does not exsist.
Wanna hear it from the EvilmorphGod himself?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fhnR...feature=relmfu
1:00 is where he states it. I would have to recommend that everyone who plans to breed morphs check out Part 1 &2. Actually I recommend watching all of Raphy's vids. Tons of great info! 
Sorry to tell you, but homozygous spider is still genetically possible and there is no proof in whether it is lethal or not. It isn't really proper to say "does not exist" when the evidence/research isn't there.
Is it lethal? Maybe, maybe not. There are not enough breedings out there to prove anything in this area. Just because high end breeders don't believe there to be doesn't mean that there isn't. They know better than to breed spider x spider because there is no point in breeding a dominant to the same dominant gene.
-
-
Re: Breeding Bumble Bee To Bumble Bee
 Originally Posted by Jessica Loesch
It's not a "super spider" as spider is a dominant gene. You don't say super pinstripe or super normal either ... The calculator has those results because in a punnet square, you have difference places where the bee pops up and they just didn't get combined.
 Originally Posted by Jessica Loesch
Sorry to tell you, but homozygous spider is still genetically possible and there is no proof in whether it is lethal or not. It isn't really proper to say "does not exist" when the evidence/research isn't there.
Is it lethal? Maybe, maybe not. There are not enough breedings out there to prove anything in this area. Just because high end breeders don't believe there to be doesn't mean that there isn't. They know better than to breed spider x spider because there is no point in breeding a dominant to the same dominant gene.
You totally contradict yourself here. First you say it's not called a super spider, second you say its possible for a homozygous form. If it has a homozygous form it is a codom, therefor the homozygous form would be a super. All of this is exactly why I made the troll post a page or two back saying "oh snap, there is super spider talk in this thread". This could go on forever.
-
-
Let me add something here. If a snake has a homozygous for and does not express traits in the heterozygous form it is a simple recessive. If it expresses traits in it's heterozygous form it is a codom. Due to the fact a spider expresses traits and you are saying it is still possible to have a homozygous form then what option is left? You guys should keep all of this super spider talk for one of the thread started for it though.
Last edited by twistedtails; 12-02-2011 at 09:50 AM.
Mike
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|