Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 2,293

0 members and 2,293 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Search Forums

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 76,080
Threads: 249,221
Posts: 2,572,814
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Rallebon
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Hybrid View

  1. 10-18-2011, 07:25 PM #1
    Jessica Loesch
    Jessica Loesch is offline
    Registered User Jessica Loesch's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-27-2011
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    1,749
    Thanks
    1,173
    Thanked 426 Times in 352 Posts
    Images: 1
    They ARE hets, genetically. They are codom hets, or heterozygous for a codominant gene. They are not recessive hets, as we normally think of.

    Muffy's Morphs


    5.7 ball pythons, 0.0.2 GTP, and some Tarantulas

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Jessica Loesch For This Useful Post:

    ReptilesK2 (10-18-2011)
  3. 10-18-2011, 11:31 PM #2
    Jonas@Balls2TheWall
    Jonas@Balls2TheWall is offline
    BPnet Veteran Jonas@Balls2TheWall's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-12-2010
    Posts
    1,659
    Thanks
    232
    Thanked 608 Times in 546 Posts

    Re: Something that has confused me for a while...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jessica Loesch View Post
    They ARE hets, genetically. They are codom hets, or heterozygous for a codominant gene. They are not recessive hets, as we normally think of.
    ^This^ Another example could be a lesser being called a het BEL
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1