Sorry Aes_Sidhe, you are still not getting me. You are repeating yourself because you are not trying to understand what I'M saying. You just keep on insisting on what YOU'RE saying!

The issue ends here:
Class III wildlife are all species not listed as Class I or Class II; and not among those species that are specifically listed as not requiring a permit for personal possession in rule 68A-6.0022, FAC.

It doesn't go beyond that.

"CLASS III WILDLIFE ARE" makes that paragraph a DEFINITION statement not an ACTION statement. Translated to plain English it means - if your animal is NOT listed in Class I, Class II, OR 68A-6.0022, it IS a Class III wildlife. If your animal IS listed in CLASS I, CLASS II, OR 68A-6.0022, it IS NOT a Class III wildlife. That paragraph has nothing to do with what you CAN DO with a Class III Wildlife.

If that's not the intent of that code, then they need to reword that code and resubmit it to Congress.