Interesting Twist on Toffee Project

[OhhWatALoser]

I was starting to wonder if you were a troll, but even if you are, im having fun now

You are the one saying "This is so" are you not? I never did. I said it may be possible, oh nay sayer.

You still fail to explain how it is possible, but I explained myself multiple times, in case you missed it....

there cannot be more than 2 alleles on a locus, when a baby is coming to be, you get 1 allele from a locus from mom and 1 allele form the same locus from dad.

As I said in the other thread, Albino and Lav do not lay on the same locus. So toffee has to lay on one or the other, there is no in between, its just simply not possible, or you guys have a new theory on how DNA is built?

and from the other thread to you

We have this thing called a locus, this is were said morphs sits, albino and lav albino have already been proven NOT to sit on the same locus and assuming we don't have a dbl het, this guy proves albino and toffee DO sit on the same locus (aka compatible). therefore it cannot be compatible with lav albino since it does not sit on the same locus.

So please correct me where I am wrong on my understanding of how loci and alleles work please? I even drew on a picture to explain myself since I obviously don't make any sense.

You say Toffino yet the animal appears to be a Toffee. Until it is bred out and proven what it is then NO one will know exactly what it is. Right now it is a mystery. What if it is a double visual?

A het Toffee was bred to a het albino... therefore it is a toffino. Your assuming these snakes are not what the people involved with the project are saying they are with your "what if"

What if the Toffee gene takes over some how and actually creates a Toffee?

What if pastel is actually a recessive gene and just so happens that every pastel that was bred to a het pastel and no one has ever hit the odds on hetxhet breeding and then it acts all crazy when two homozygous pastels are bred together and some how makes what we call a super pastel.

I can play the what if game also.

But yet you and a few others say exactly what it is? The people working with the project aren't doing that. Just some of the experts.

I have not seen one person involved with this project make such bold statements yet of what is going on as I have seen you make.

Ummm... check the video in the first post? you also need to still explain to me how you need to be involved with the project to know whats going on? Unless your assuming their all lying to us?

And sorry sir but you are no genetic expert and you know really nothing beyond what the majority of breeders knows bout ball python genetics. I am no expert on genetics. I do know about Loci, allels and genomes as well as other genetic junk. I am no expert but I also don't pretend to be. I also know what Dominance means, what INCOMPLETE dominance means and what co-dominance means and what each of then do.

congrads, you know how to classify things. YAY for mandel. Which btw has nothing to do with the disagreement. Nice attempt at slander though.

Until some one takes the time and money needed to map the ball python genome then all we have to go on is what is proven out by breeding.

generic statement, we can never 100% prove anything, 99.9% is just not good enough.