» Site Navigation
0 members and 665 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,113
Posts: 2,572,179
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
|
-
Registered User
Re: Harlequin Wide-Stripe
I think there are also various types of what people would describe as harlequin, some being dominant/codominantly genetically inheritable, some perhaps only polygenetically.
I believe that is where the confusion over inheritability arises.
I know I keep seeing snakes being described as harlequins that to me look similar in pattern type, but that is it. No melty sides, not enough black, colour wrong....etc.
In the same way a non-genetic very reduced pattern/banded could look like a type 2 woma, but isn't.
-
-
Registered User
Polygenetic, you say? That is definitely an interesting concept and could explain why the odds have been so poor with the wide-stripe clutches. Unlike most dominant or co-dominant mutations, there could be more than one gene at play... so rather than 50% odds you've got more like 25%, or even less - could be impossible to determine the real % chance without knowing how many genes are affected on the allele. The gene should still be inheritable by the offspring, though. Is that right or am I confused here...
I believe with Classic Jungles (mind you I haven't dug very deep with them) the genetics are not transferrable and it is just a fluke that one hatches out. To my knowledge there hasn't been any success in trying to breed the mutation as a dominant, co-dominant or recessive trait. I'd imagine there was a lot of work put into trying to prove them out...
Then theres all these other wacky genes like the spector x yellowbelly = superstripe, which then produces both spectors and yellowbellies... Desert females not producing... Caramels hatching out kinked at random... etc etc.
I'm no genetics expert lol I've only been learning about them through ball python websites for the past year or two, but I find it all so compelling... so if anyone would care to explain this polygenetic theory in more detail it would be much appreciated. Are there any other morphs thought to be polygenetic?
-
-
Re: Harlequin Wide-Stripe
Hi,
That's another point - it wouldn't have to be on the same allele. 
Think of it like NERDs statments about the het pied gene having a visual effect in some combos.
You might end up that what we call harlequins are actually double heterozygous (or homozygous ) for two (visual or non-visual ) mutations and that it is sheer fluke there is a visual effect when the two are in the same animal.
Which potentially leads to some seriously nerfed up results from breeding two visual animals together;
Results
6.25%Normal
12.5%het. Harequin type A (non visual )
6.25%Harelquin type B (non visual )
6.25%Harlequin type A (non visual )
12.5%het. Harlequin type B (non visual )
12.5%Harlequin type A, het Harelquin type B ( visual? )
12.5%Harlequin type B, het Harelquin type B ( visual? )
6.25%Harlequin type A, Harelquin type B ( visual? )
25%het. Harlequin type A, het. Harlequin type B (visual? )
Which would give 56.25% possibly visual animals from breeding to harlequins together. Or 25% if only the double homozygous was a visual expressed combination.
Either way the chances per egg would be different than we would have expected but would need a large sample to try and prove those were the odds anyone was actually getting.
But I'm guessing it cannot be as simple as only the double homozygous being visual as that would mean breeding two harlequins together would give 100% harlequins as a result.
If it was allelic (sp? ) then breeding two visual parents together should give 25% harlequins as a result. But you also couldn't get harlequins from breeding to an animal that didn't have one of the genes.
And all this is based on a blind hope it is that simple and involve a combination of the those concepts or more than 2 genes. 
Excuse me I think I need to go lie down with a cloth over my head till the hurting stops.
dr del
Derek
7 adult Royals (2.5), 1.0 COS Pastel, 1.0 Enchi, 1.1 Lesser platty Royal python, 1.1 Black pastel Royal python, 0.1 Blue eyed leucistic ( Super lesser), 0.1 Piebald Royal python, 1.0 Sinaloan milk snake 1.0 crested gecko and 1 bad case of ETS. no wife, no surprise.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to dr del For This Useful Post:
-
Registered User
I think I'll opt for an herbal remedy.... how much more confused could I really get. 
Thanks though, that theory is really something else.
-
-
Re: Harlequin Wide-Stripe
Here is a "Dinker" that I picked up at a local pet store a few months ago. I'm begining to wonder if he could be a Harlequin?



Thoughts?
-Jordan
Balls
0.1 Pinstripe.............................1.0 DH Lavender Snow
0.2 PH Lavender Albino.............0.1 Bumblebee
0.1 Pastel PH Ghost..................1.0 Pastel Het Ghost
0.2 PH Ghost (Twins)................1.0 Cinnamon
0.1 Het TSK Axanthic................1.3 Mojave
0.1 Het Albino..........................1.0 Albino PH Pied
1.1 Het Pied.............................1.0 Dinker
1.2 Normal...............................1.0 Pastel Lesser
Boa
0.1 Super Salmon Het Sunglow
Check us out at: http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Dem...13090085417762
-
-
Registered User
-
-
-
The Following User Says Thank You to jsmorphs2 For This Useful Post:
-
Re: Harlequin Wide-Stripe
I will chime in here only briefly, busy day here at PE and SYR : )
We started working with some "wild stripe" stuff back in the 90's. The epitome of the dinker project, at the time. We hatched a couple of fully striped babies, but this was before the Ball python morph craze, so I didn't recognize the significance of it. I sold one of those full PE stripes to Tracy at VPI, way back when.
We raised some, including partial stripes, and while VMS Sean was working here at PE, he picked up some of that line.
I don't know when they became "Harlequin", but I have never referred to them that way. At this point, we just call them PE Stripes.
I STILL don't understand how they work. There is a great variance in the amount of striping, from full stripe, to partial stripes, to no stripes. That keyhole feature comes into play often as well. But it is all so unpredictable.
We really started making some progress with our "Double Het Ghost PE Stripes". We bred a PE Stripe (not a fantastic one, just a mostly striped one) to a Ghost/Hypo. Those babies all looked normal. After raising them up for 6 or 7 years, we bred them back together and got PE Stripe Ghosts. The striping still varies animal to animal, or doesn't appear at all. Some of those Ghost PE Stripes are pictured below, along with some of the better PE Stripes.
We have also done Pin PE Stripes and Lesser PE Stripes...
Ghost PE Stripe from 2010- from normal appearing Double Het parents:


The best "plain" PE Stripes appear like this:
-
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Robyn@SYR For This Useful Post:
Aes_Sidhe (05-16-2011),Drewp (05-16-2011),jsmorphs2 (05-16-2011)
-
-
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Robyn@SYR For This Useful Post:
Aes_Sidhe (05-16-2011),Drewp (05-16-2011),jsmorphs2 (05-16-2011)
-
Re: Harlequin Wide-Stripe
 Originally Posted by Robyn@SYR
And the best one yet, hatched in 2010:
Now I REALLY don't know what is going on : )
So this came from breeding double het PE Stripe/Hypos?! WOW! Makes me consider breeding our "harlequin" girl with our male hypo next season instead of a yellowbelly and holding on to the clutch.
~Jessica~

-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|