Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 756

0 members and 756 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,104
Posts: 2,572,101
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 10 of 124

Threaded View

  1. #33
    BPnet Veteran Egapal's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-28-2008
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    689
    Thanks
    59
    Thanked 213 Times in 138 Posts
    Images: 8

    Re: New smoking restrictions in Washington. Oh boy!

    Quote Originally Posted by Seru1 View Post
    My entire point is the government doesn't have the right to ban smoking in private homes and businesses. Thats my point. The business have the right, but not the government. That alone is the crux of my argument.

    You guys are right I could get cancer later. But can you prove it was caused by Second hand smoke? No. Lots of things cause cancer, and science changes all the time cause it's made by fallible man. Heck Scientists change there minds everyday. Take eggs as an example. For years the couldn't decide if they were good or bad for you.


    So say I get get cancer. Prove it was because of smoke inhalation. You really can't. The fact is despite all the research we don't know a ton about cancer, and unless you two are cancer researchers, you don't know alot about it either. Oh you might know more than me, thats no feat. But you can't prove the cause of someone's cancer is second hand smoke or even 1st hand. There's alot of factors.

    How do you guys explain all the people who smoke like a fire and live to be 80, 90, even 100?

    Look I'm not saying smoking is good for ya. Heck no everyone knows it's bad for your health. I'm saying it's been blown out of proportion. And I'm saying people have the right to do things that are bad for them.
    People do have the right to do things they want and in general I think people should be allowed to smoke in a private home. Now that being said these are homes that are subsidized by tax payer money. If you want to spend your money to buy cigarettes then make enough to afford a residence all by yourself along with those cigarettes.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Egapal For This Useful Post:

    hoax (03-31-2011)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1