Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 703

0 members and 703 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,112
Posts: 2,572,162
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Results 1 to 10 of 43

Threaded View

  1. #28
    BPnet Veteran Rhasputin's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-06-2010
    Location
    Mechanicsville Virginia
    Posts
    1,542
    Thanks
    399
    Thanked 348 Times in 269 Posts
    Images: 5
    Reptilegirl whereas i agree with some of your points, your dismissal of scientific evidence is disturbing.


    Untreated pine does have harmful side effects, and that was what the tests were based on. The evidence supporting pine, is all for treated pine, not un-treated.
    Un-treated pine does in fact cause health issues in small mammals (comparable [since it's the same thing in a lower dose] to the effects of cedar on small mammals), which is why it is not used in laboratories (mainly the enzyme changes in the liver, which can effect the way an animal metabolizes medications, and reacts to testing).

    Last edited by Rhasputin; 03-30-2011 at 06:53 PM.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Rhasputin For This Useful Post:

    PsychD_Student (03-31-2013)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1