Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,235

1 members and 1,234 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,934
Threads: 249,129
Posts: 2,572,284
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, LavadaCanc
Results 1 to 10 of 124

Threaded View

  1. #30
    BPnet Senior Member Inknsteel's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-09-2007
    Location
    Haddonfield, New Jersey, United States
    Posts
    1,387
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked 557 Times in 321 Posts

    Re: New smoking restrictions in Washington. Oh boy!

    Quote Originally Posted by Seru1 View Post
    Then you don't understand our government we aren't based on Majority rule. We're based on a Representative republic governed by a constitution. We are not a democracy.

    So you don't smoke around kids. Fine whatever have a parade. I don't smoke period.
    Well yay for you then, maybe we should throw YOU a parade. And if this is the case, then don't take it personally because you aren't part of the group this effects, nor are you one of the offenders whose lack of regard for other people has caused it to become legislated. In an ideal society, we would all respect the rights of others and would make conscious efforts to ensure that exercising our own rights does not infringe on the rights of anyone else.

    Quote Originally Posted by Seru1 View Post
    My entire point was it's not the right of the government to tell a private entity they can't allow smoking on the premises. You can choose not to go to that private entity. Speak and vote with your dollar. If your right they will close down from lack of business. Now if the government wants to ban smoking in government owned areas like parks and government buildings then fine thats there right.
    And this right here brings me full circle to my initial post in this thread. We're talking about GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIZED HOUSING. According to posters in the state of Washington, there is already legislation on the books banning smoking within 25 feet of entrances to public buildings. So, the "new" legislation that warranted this entire thread was only talking about the government enforcing a ban on smoking within 25 feet of the public entrance of this government owned or subsidized building. They own it, they're the landlords, they're the final word.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Inknsteel For This Useful Post:

    Seru1 (03-30-2011)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1