Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 614

0 members and 614 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,106
Posts: 2,572,115
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Threaded View

  1. #2
    BPnet Senior Member
    Join Date
    03-04-2011
    Posts
    1,132
    Thanks
    465
    Thanked 427 Times in 341 Posts
    I would be more worried about the lack of depth in the gene pool if importations were to cease entirely, Garden, as opposed to a lack of new morphs being created. My opinion only and I don't know that science would back me up, but with the animals currently available, there are untold numbers of morphs still to be created/discovered just from what is currently available. I think the wild imports just short-cut the process by a few hundred thousand years by introducing new genes as opposed to waiting for nature to take it's course and new morphs to emerge from the crossing of the animals that are currently available.

    Interesting topic to raise and I'd be interested to see what other people think about that, as your argument makes sense.
    Before all else, be armed. - Niccolo Machiavelli

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to youbeyouibei For This Useful Post:

    gardenfiend138 (03-25-2011)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1