Grass is orange though
Study up on light physics.
You could say that my arguement is flawed, but the implications I have made are very well considered. You mere perception of this whole argument, and your profession of your own argument implies in itself that you feel above your own belief of humanities animal nature.It is obvious that your logic is flawed. My statement of things that are alive being capable of feeling love is that they have in one way or another a dependency on certain aspects of their surroundings. Much like how a ball python is going to go off of feed, if it is not in the right surroundings. It is not where it is comfortable. To be able to percieve comfort, or trust, shows in itself that the animal is capable in some form of love. I think the problem here is the perception of love. Humanity has a whole whackload of conditions it puts on love.. Love is this, if this is present, or if this isnt present, blah blah blah. Love is love. Love is the attraction of itself. And in the laws of attraction, all arguments are invalid, and valid. So to merely having the capacity of saying NO you're wrong. Is only stating that you are ignorant, and have grown up in a corrupt society with the belief that the answer you have been taught is the only answer that could possibly be correct.
"It is when man believes that he has found the answer, that all human progress has stopped"
Reply With Quote