The notion that two people with differing opinion should have equal weight given to their opinion is ludicrous. If you think the sun rising and setting is our perception of the rotation of our planet earth and I think that that Ra is driving his chariot of fire across the sky, we aren't both equally likely to be correct. What is your evidence to support your claims. You are saying that a snake that strikes at your hand is doing so because he thinks your hand is food and that by feeding the snake in another enclosure you can eliminate this behavior. Have you done any studies to prove this. I have seen no evidence to support the theory. It seams to be me that some people came up with a theory that seams reasonable and ran with it with out evidence. The snake could be striking at your hand for a number of reasons. For instance lets assume that you have two people who more or less never handle their snake. The person who feeds their snake in a separate enclosure handles their snake more than someone who does not handle theirs except to clean. That could make someone think that the trick is to feed in a separate enclosure where the trick might be to just handle more often. Now you might say, whats the harm if it works. Well the harm is that some snakes are very susceptible to fasting due to stress. Moving your snake to a feeding tub and back might be fine for some snakes and completely stress out others. My snake gets fed in her cage and has never struck at me. If you are going to put forth a theory and claim it to be fact you have to have evidence that backs up that theory. Having a snake that is fed in its cage and strikes or having a cage that is fed in a feeding tub and does not strike is not evidence for that theory alone. You would need a larger sample set, with a control. That experiment would then be given more weight each time it was shown to be repeatable. Until then the person with no theory at all is more correct as its a default state.