Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 811

1 members and 810 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,945
Threads: 249,140
Posts: 2,572,332
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, SONOMANOODLES
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Threaded View

  1. #10
    BPnet Veteran Wh00h0069's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-30-2007
    Location
    Middletown, OH
    Posts
    4,349
    Thanks
    915
    Thanked 832 Times in 736 Posts
    Images: 8

    Re: Clutch size concerning co-doms

    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Knowles View Post
    Yes, I have read a lot about female breeding weight. Some have claimed breeding at 900g. I wasn't even going to consider breeding until at least 2000g, which very well might be in the 3yr range.

    And I have also noticed that co-dom prices are falling. I've been working my Punnett squares with different co-doms that are also het for the same recessive trait; ie. Spider het Axanthic X Pastel X Axanthic. Even if I don't get that 1 in 16 winner, I'll hopefully have a grab-bag of hets left over.


    And thanks for the welcome!
    Hi Chris. You are on to something there. Simple recessive / codom combos are, in my opinion, the way to go. They will hold their value better than codom / codom combos, and still be a lot easier to make than simple recessive / simple recessive combos. I also think that the codom / simple recessive hets would be worth a lot more, and hold their value better than simple recessive hets alone. Good luck with whatever you decide to do.
    Eddie Strong, Jr.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Wh00h0069 For This Useful Post:

    Chris Knowles (12-29-2010)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1