Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 786

3 members and 783 guests
Most users ever online was 9,191, 03-09-2025 at 12:17 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,877
Threads: 249,072
Posts: 2,571,984
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, pickledratinajar
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Threaded View

  1. #3
    BPnet Senior Member kitedemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-01-2010
    Location
    NS Canada
    Posts
    6,062
    Thanks
    657
    Thanked 1,795 Times in 1,391 Posts
    Images: 11
    Crazy4 has the right of it. The CHE's tend to dry out things a lot and if the tank is a tall one they often don't get a hot spot (generally accepted 90-94) They can be use to try and lift the ambient temps up some but are not very efficient to do so.

    UTH need some sort of control there are a lot out there the advantage of a programable proportional control (herpstat, helix, excozone) is you don't have to mess with it, set it where you want it and it takes care of the rest. The cheap on off type (zoo med 500r) can allow very high spikes if there is not some sort of intermediate space in between. I don't have any experience with the programable devices like a ranco so I can speak to it.

    Rheostats can not adjust for room temperatures variations, they either need to be in a constant room temp or need to be adjusted everyday. Thermostats will do that daily adjustment for you.
    Alex

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to kitedemon For This Useful Post:

    el8ch (12-28-2010)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1