Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 592

0 members and 592 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,113
Posts: 2,572,171
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Threaded View

  1. #13
    BPnet Veteran BAMReptiles's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-06-2010
    Posts
    398
    Thanks
    89
    Thanked 32 Times in 30 Posts
    then that ONE person can be punished to the full extent of the law.

    it applies for any pet. if it gets loose and hurts someone it should be YOUR responsibility. i dont care if 5 other people around you own a tiger/dog/wolverine/whatever. you should be allowed to keep whatever you want, and only you should be punished accordingly if something bad happens, not any other person who keeps said animal

    extenuating circumstances such as a brain tumor are not the issue here. its the perception of "dangerous" pets. a brain tumor is 150% out of the keepers control. keeping your pet that you know "could" harm others safely kept, is the issue
    Last edited by BAMReptiles; 12-11-2010 at 12:24 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1