Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 548

1 members and 547 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,115
Posts: 2,572,187
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Threaded View

  1. #7
    BPnet Veteran Matt K's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-12-2009
    Posts
    573
    Thanks
    97
    Thanked 178 Times in 132 Posts

    Re: Interesting read

    Quote Originally Posted by OhhWatALoser View Post
    by chance can anyone answer these?
    Eye pigment is unrelated to leucism. An animal can still be a true leucistic and have colored eye pigment, as the defect causing leucism is rooted solely in the skin of the animal. This would explain why no matter what you mix with a leucistic, it always lacks color--melanin or pigment cells of any sort die in the skin as a result of the defect. Super Lessers and Butters are true leucistics, while Super Fires and Mojaves aren't, as their skin can clearly support even trace amounts of pigment. By the standards of this paper, the classic yellow-blotched look of Super Fires/Sulfurs might actually be a form of Piebaldism, but you'd have to see if normal pigment could be sustained by the white patches of skin to prove or disprove this I suppose.

    Cheers,
    -Matt


    R.I.P. Steve, I'll miss you more than you could have ever known. I love you.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Matt K For This Useful Post:

    OhhWatALoser (11-30-2010)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1