Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,042

3 members and 1,039 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,947
Threads: 249,146
Posts: 2,572,383
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, featheredhs
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Threaded View

  1. #10
    BPnet Lifer mainbutter's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-30-2008
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    5,690
    Thanks
    269
    Thanked 1,374 Times in 1,053 Posts
    Images: 7

    Re: Very Disturbing IMO

    Quote Originally Posted by deathfromabove View Post
    but as a hunter i can understand what they are doing cuz if you think about it what natural predators does it really have to keep the population down?
    The biggest factor of rattlesnake populations is how much prey is available. Well-fed females will readily breed and have much larger clutches, poorly fed animals may just perish.

    I'd happily eat snake.

    However, the entire 'roundup' phenomenon treats the animal inhumanely.

    I eat meat. I kill wild animals and eat them as well.

    However, I don't capture the animals I harvest and, prior to dispatching them, put them on display in terrible living conditions for others to gawk at as I put on a show.

    I have zero issue with hunting snakes. I have zero issue with responsible population management if harvesting some animals will IMPROVE an ecosystem.

    However, the 'rattlesnake roundups' are done for serious profit. Any negative impact on species populations is going to be ignored as long as money is being made.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to mainbutter For This Useful Post:

    Coils (11-18-2010)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1