Interesting lens I have basically ignored the DX series as they are made for the half frame cameras. I can only guess the longevity of that format, in a few years will all nikons be full frame? I don't know. The 85 is an unknown I have never owned one and have not had one in my hand. I can't really comment on it until I see one. as I said VR really make no difference when using the lens as a macro if you use it as a portrait lens too it is awesome.

I make 100 percent of my living as a photographer, I shoot commercial clients and teach photography in a university. I use my 60 at least 50% of the time. I have actually worn one out and am on my second (after 16 years of use) I can't say it is better or worse than the 85 you linked all I can say is it is a good well made (heavy) work horse.

As for zooms basically you get what you pay for. Expensive zooms are great through the range all apertures and focal lengths, Cheaper ones are designed around a single point then bridged to the rest they usually will have a 'sweet spot' where they are really good then as you get farther away from it not so good. Again I have no direct experience with this lens so no comment on that one exactly. I am a bit biased (and a bit old school) I don't use any zooms professionally I have a prime kit, 8mm to 300mm the slowest lens I own is a 2.8 and the fastest a 1.2.

I always recommend the standard 50mm it is fast and sharp and for 150$ hard to match I love the length for fashion I keep an old half frame camera just to use it.
Alex