Over the last year it seemed that common opinion was that the Toffee and Candy were at least VERY similar genes. That Candy hatchling looks nothing like the Toffee hatchlings I have seen.
Toffees look like Albinos(I know they acquire color over there first year/1000 grams). That PINKISH Candy looks more like a recessive Banana/Coral than a yellow Albino. Is there newer info that I missed? As hatchlings they present as RADICALLY DIFFERENT morphs to my eye.
P.S. HOT BABY CANDY!!!!!!!!!!!
Last edited by Bill Buchman; 07-30-2010 at 01:50 AM.
Over the last year it seemed that common opinion was that the Toffee and Candy were at least VERY similar genes. That Candy hatchling looks nothing like the Toffee hatchlings I have seen.
Toffees look like Albinos(I know they acquire color over there first year/1000 grams). That PINKISH Candy looks more like a recessive Banana/Coral than a yellow Albino. Is there newer info that I missed? As hatchlings they present as RADICALLY DIFFERENT morphs to my eye.
P.S. HOT BABY CANDY!!!!!!!!!!!
That's not a baby in the pic. That's a yearling. Candyballs do in fact look like Toffees as a baby. They may or may not be compatible, but they both go through the same radical change.
That's not a baby in the pic. That's a yearling. Candyballs do in fact look like Toffees as a baby. They may or may not be compatible, but they both go through the same radical change.
Hope that clears it up for yah.
Thanks. Now that I took a second look at the photo I clearly see it is a sub-adult. Very nice morph!!!!!!
Originally Posted by python1024
Now if only these 2 leeetle guys would hurry up and get that big and purty.
Reply With Quote
Is there newer info that I missed? As hatchlings they present as RADICALLY DIFFERENT morphs to my eye.
Very nice morph!!!!!! 
