» Site Navigation
0 members and 684 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,910
Threads: 249,115
Posts: 2,572,187
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
|
-
Registered User
Super Mojave X Super Mojave?
So from what I understand the reason most people choose not to do a Mojave X Mojave BEL is due to the "dirty" heads. I was wondering what would happen if you bred two BELs that were both Super Mojaves together. From what I under stand about the logistics of leutistics wouldn't their offspring be less likely to be "dirty", or at least have around a 25% chance of being "cleaner" or am I completely off base here?
Last edited by boyyoyo; 07-17-2010 at 12:56 PM.
-
-
Re: Super Mojave X Super Mojave?
Super mojo will always be a super mojo...with a purpleish head.
Think about it.
The super gives HALF its make up to offspring....so they would be Mojos....the other super would give HALF its make up...to be all Mojos.
So really...super to super...would only make Supers.
Not a "better" super.
Last edited by Patrick Long; 07-17-2010 at 01:05 PM.
-
-
Registered User
Re: Super Mojave X Super Mojave?
So if that's true, then Super Mojaves arn't true leucistics? From what I know about Leucism is that it essentially "overrides" all other color genes in any animal that has it, hence makes them white. So (unless i'm wrong, which I very possibly am) breeding true Leucistics to one another would make any genetic "dirtyness" vanish in their offspring correct?
-
-
BPnet Veteran
Re: Super Mojave X Super Mojave?
leucism is a over production of white. piedball are some sort of leucistic too. ivorys are leucistic ether.
in burms u got some leucistics with lonely single black scales.
most leucistics are not pure white. i would say the majority is dirty white (in all snakes).
its simple an overproduction of white- not a lack of ability to produce any color- therefore its comin that u have not true white sankes....
Last edited by joe23; 07-17-2010 at 01:37 PM.
-
-
Registered User
Re: Super Mojave X Super Mojave?
"Leucism is a general term for the phenotype resulting from defects in pigment... This results in either the entire surface ... or patches of body surface ... having a lack of cells capable of making pigment." So actually Leucism is exactly the lack of ability to produce pigment.
-
-
Re: Super Mojave X Super Mojave?
Supper mojavies are homozygous for the mojave version of the blue eyed leucistic gene. They don't have a normal copy or any other allele of this gene to give their offspring. So just like homozygous albino X homozygous albino produces 100% albino babies super mojave X super mojave produces 100% super mojave babies that should look like their parents.
-
-
BPnet Veteran
Re: Super Mojave X Super Mojave?
im pretty sure that the supers would look the same, but i dont know why people dont like super mojaves. I actually like the bit purple on the head
-
-
Registered User
Re: Super Mojave X Super Mojave?
 Originally Posted by reptidude1
im pretty sure that the supers would look the same, but i dont know why people dont like super mojaves. I actually like the bit purple on the head
Same here, we bred mojave x mojave specifically for the head color.
Adam Staley

-
-
BPnet Veteran
Re: Super Mojave X Super Mojave?
 Originally Posted by boyyoyo
So if that's true, then Super Mojaves arn't true leucistics? From what I know about Leucism is that it essentially "overrides" all other color genes in any animal that has it, hence makes them white. So (unless i'm wrong, which I very possibly am) breeding true Leucistics to one another would make any genetic "dirtyness" vanish in their offspring correct?
 Originally Posted by boyyoyo
"Leucism is a general term for the phenotype resulting from defects in pigment... This results in either the entire surface ... or patches of body surface ... having a lack of cells capable of making pigment." So actually Leucism is exactly the lack of ability to produce pigment.
you just answered your own question they can be lucistic and still have some sort of color as in the dirty head on the super mojo and the patches of pattern on the pied
if you want a cleaner one bred a super mojo with a butter or lesser
Last edited by 771subliminal; 07-17-2010 at 04:03 PM.
"So far this is the oldest that I've been"
'If you can make it through the nite, there's a brighter day'
"I'm out the game, put the 2nd string in."
"live with the pain and keep trying or die knowing you never gave anything a chance"
"Death is not the greatest loss in life. The greatest loss is what dies inside while still alive"
"No one can take away your dreams"

People for the Ethical Treatment of Agriculture
-
-
Registered User
Re: Super Mojave X Super Mojave?
 Originally Posted by 771subliminal
you just answered your own question they can be lucistic and still have some sort of color as in the dirty head on the super mojo and the patches of pattern on the pied
if you want a cleaner one bred a super mojo with a butter or lesser
Thats totally fine. Honestly I really don't mind the "dirty" look I was simply asking hypothetically. I intend to produce my own BELS made using Mojaves and was just curious what would happen. It's just I hear so much about people breeding for BELS, but hear very little in terms of breeding BELS together. I guess that's simply because they're so straight forward.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|