Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 684

0 members and 684 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

» Stats

Members: 75,910
Threads: 249,115
Posts: 2,572,187
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17
  1. #1
    Registered User boyyoyo's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-02-2010
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Super Mojave X Super Mojave?

    So from what I understand the reason most people choose not to do a Mojave X Mojave BEL is due to the "dirty" heads. I was wondering what would happen if you bred two BELs that were both Super Mojaves together. From what I under stand about the logistics of leutistics wouldn't their offspring be less likely to be "dirty", or at least have around a 25% chance of being "cleaner" or am I completely off base here?
    Last edited by boyyoyo; 07-17-2010 at 12:56 PM.

  2. #2
    BPnet Veteran Patrick Long's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-16-2005
    Location
    Ventura, California, United States
    Posts
    8,209
    Thanks
    564
    Thanked 987 Times in 736 Posts
    Images: 36

    Re: Super Mojave X Super Mojave?

    Super mojo will always be a super mojo...with a purpleish head.

    Think about it.

    The super gives HALF its make up to offspring....so they would be Mojos....the other super would give HALF its make up...to be all Mojos.

    So really...super to super...would only make Supers.

    Not a "better" super.
    Last edited by Patrick Long; 07-17-2010 at 01:05 PM.

  3. #3
    Registered User boyyoyo's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-02-2010
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Re: Super Mojave X Super Mojave?

    So if that's true, then Super Mojaves arn't true leucistics? From what I know about Leucism is that it essentially "overrides" all other color genes in any animal that has it, hence makes them white. So (unless i'm wrong, which I very possibly am) breeding true Leucistics to one another would make any genetic "dirtyness" vanish in their offspring correct?

  4. #4
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    12-07-2009
    Posts
    401
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 74 Times in 57 Posts
    Images: 16

    Re: Super Mojave X Super Mojave?

    leucism is a over production of white. piedball are some sort of leucistic too. ivorys are leucistic ether.
    in burms u got some leucistics with lonely single black scales.

    most leucistics are not pure white. i would say the majority is dirty white (in all snakes).

    its simple an overproduction of white- not a lack of ability to produce any color- therefore its comin that u have not true white sankes....
    Last edited by joe23; 07-17-2010 at 01:37 PM.

  5. #5
    Registered User boyyoyo's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-02-2010
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Re: Super Mojave X Super Mojave?

    "Leucism is a general term for the phenotype resulting from defects in pigment... This results in either the entire surface ... or patches of body surface ... having a lack of cells capable of making pigment." So actually Leucism is exactly the lack of ability to produce pigment.

  6. #6
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    11-13-2003
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,555
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 247 Times in 186 Posts
    Images: 28

    Re: Super Mojave X Super Mojave?

    Supper mojavies are homozygous for the mojave version of the blue eyed leucistic gene. They don't have a normal copy or any other allele of this gene to give their offspring. So just like homozygous albino X homozygous albino produces 100% albino babies super mojave X super mojave produces 100% super mojave babies that should look like their parents.

  7. #7
    BPnet Veteran reptidude1's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-29-2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    648
    Thanks
    80
    Thanked 39 Times in 35 Posts

    Re: Super Mojave X Super Mojave?

    im pretty sure that the supers would look the same, but i dont know why people dont like super mojaves. I actually like the bit purple on the head

  8. #8
    Registered User astaley's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-24-2006
    Location
    Coastal South Carolina
    Posts
    93
    Thanks
    54
    Thanked 19 Times in 15 Posts
    Images: 5

    Re: Super Mojave X Super Mojave?

    Quote Originally Posted by reptidude1 View Post
    im pretty sure that the supers would look the same, but i dont know why people dont like super mojaves. I actually like the bit purple on the head
    Same here, we bred mojave x mojave specifically for the head color.
    Adam Staley

  9. #9
    BPnet Veteran 771subliminal's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-04-2007
    Location
    Da Real Motown
    Posts
    1,433
    Thanks
    454
    Thanked 267 Times in 211 Posts
    Images: 24

    Re: Super Mojave X Super Mojave?

    Quote Originally Posted by boyyoyo View Post
    So if that's true, then Super Mojaves arn't true leucistics? From what I know about Leucism is that it essentially "overrides" all other color genes in any animal that has it, hence makes them white. So (unless i'm wrong, which I very possibly am) breeding true Leucistics to one another would make any genetic "dirtyness" vanish in their offspring correct?
    Quote Originally Posted by boyyoyo View Post
    "Leucism is a general term for the phenotype resulting from defects in pigment... This results in either the entire surface ... or patches of body surface ... having a lack of cells capable of making pigment." So actually Leucism is exactly the lack of ability to produce pigment.
    you just answered your own question they can be lucistic and still have some sort of color as in the dirty head on the super mojo and the patches of pattern on the pied

    if you want a cleaner one bred a super mojo with a butter or lesser
    Last edited by 771subliminal; 07-17-2010 at 04:03 PM.
    "So far this is the oldest that I've been"
    'If you can make it through the nite, there's a brighter day'
    "I'm out the game, put the 2nd string in."
    "live with the pain and keep trying or die knowing you never gave anything a chance"
    "Death is not the greatest loss in life. The greatest loss is what dies inside while still alive"
    "No one can take away your dreams"



    People for the Ethical Treatment of Agriculture

  10. #10
    Registered User boyyoyo's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-02-2010
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Re: Super Mojave X Super Mojave?

    Quote Originally Posted by 771subliminal View Post
    you just answered your own question they can be lucistic and still have some sort of color as in the dirty head on the super mojo and the patches of pattern on the pied

    if you want a cleaner one bred a super mojo with a butter or lesser
    Thats totally fine. Honestly I really don't mind the "dirty" look I was simply asking hypothetically. I intend to produce my own BELS made using Mojaves and was just curious what would happen. It's just I hear so much about people breeding for BELS, but hear very little in terms of breeding BELS together. I guess that's simply because they're so straight forward.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1