Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 688

0 members and 688 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,117
Posts: 2,572,191
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20
  1. #11
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    12-07-2009
    Posts
    401
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 74 Times in 57 Posts
    Images: 16

    Re: Is anyone working to try and produce a Pearl?

    Quote Originally Posted by Gavin Cooper View Post
    The wobble has nothing to do with the question. He's referring to the fact that a Spider to Spider pairing will only produced het Spiders so to speak. There is no Super form. The homo version is lethal meaning that there are no homogeneous Spiders out there.


    Gavin
    thats what i meant. but hes probably easier to understand than me- have sometimes trouble to make clear what i mean in english.

    hes right - the wobble has nothin to do with that. when u breed a pinstripe to a pinstripe u get 100% pinstripes that are homozygot. it means they have no superform (look like normal pins) but when bread to a normal ALL the babies are pinstripe. not so in spider- u get "het" spiders from a spider x spider breeding...


    is it true that all pearls starve to death??? i heard that rumor a lot...

  2. #12
    BPnet Veteran cinderbird's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-20-2007
    Location
    Silver Spring, MD
    Posts
    2,170
    Thanks
    551
    Thanked 480 Times in 363 Posts
    Images: 4

    Re: Is anyone working to try and produce a Pearl?

    except that the spider x spider being homozygous lethal still hasn't been substantiated.

    But i don't know of anyone thats working with the hidden gene womas to make pearls. I think its like the leucy carpets (super jags). Its just not compatible with life for long. But i'd love to see some research done on it.

  3. #13
    BPnet Veteran sg1trogdor's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-21-2007
    Location
    los angeles california
    Posts
    2,505
    Thanks
    263
    Thanked 225 Times in 191 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: Is anyone working to try and produce a Pearl?

    Quote Originally Posted by joe23 View Post
    when u breed a pinstripe to a pinstripe u get 100% pinstripes that are homozygot. it means they have no superform (look like normal pins) but when bread to a normal ALL the babies are pinstripe. ...
    Really I have never heard of this. Didn't know that a dominant gene could have a super form. Now co-dom yes but not dom. I may be wrong but this is the first time I have ever heard of this. I just figure that you would see people selling super pins and you don't. Just my If anyone has any info on this I would love to see some sources. I am interested. As far as I know from marcus jaynes site pins have been proven dominant with no super form.
    Chris http://dragcave.net/user/sg1trogdor
    Time for some until I see

  4. #14
    BPnet Lifer mainbutter's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-30-2008
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    5,690
    Thanks
    269
    Thanked 1,374 Times in 1,053 Posts
    Images: 7

    Re: Is anyone working to try and produce a Pearl?

    Quote Originally Posted by sg1trogdor View Post
    Didn't know that a dominant gene could have a super form.
    The DEFINITION of a dominant trait is that it is always fully expressed in a heterozygote, being equally as fully expressed as a homozygote as well.

  5. #15
    BPnet Veteran Oxylepy's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-25-2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,383
    Thanks
    362
    Thanked 573 Times in 434 Posts

    Re: Is anyone working to try and produce a Pearl?

    I was under the impression about a year ago that someone had produced a spider that had sired on spider offspring, meaning it would be a homozygous spider, however it's possible it was a pin.

    As for the homozygous form of spider being lethal, has this ever been proven? I believe that one would need to test every spider to be sure that they are 100% heterozygous and there are no homozygous forms. Someone could easily have one and never breed it, or breed it and just think they got lucky.

    Also it would be really interesting to know what protein synthesis each gene altered, that could easily explain whether or not any gene was fatal, as the lack of production/over production/altered form production of a protein could mean the animal has no immune system, cannot digest some mineral, etc.
    Ball Pythons 1.1 Lesser, Pastel
    1.0 Lesser Pastel, 0.0.7 mixed babies

  6. #16
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    12-07-2009
    Posts
    401
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 74 Times in 57 Posts
    Images: 16

    Re: Is anyone working to try and produce a Pearl?

    Quote Originally Posted by sg1trogdor View Post
    Really I have never heard of this. Didn't know that a dominant gene could have a super form. Now co-dom yes but not dom. I may be wrong but this is the first time I have ever heard of this. I just figure that you would see people selling super pins and you don't. Just my If anyone has any info on this I would love to see some sources. I am interested. As far as I know from marcus jaynes site pins have been proven dominant with no super form.

    well it has no visual superform- thats right. but im 99,999% sure taht it is like i wrote before- breed a pin x pin gives u homozygous pinstripes- bread to a normal 100% of the babies are pins.

    ive read it in books and in reptile magazins, so im pretty sure that its correct.

  7. #17
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    12-07-2009
    Posts
    401
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 74 Times in 57 Posts
    Images: 16

    Re: Is anyone working to try and produce a Pearl?

    ive just checked serval genetic calculators- now im 100% sure about the hom. pinstripe!!!

    it is like i said...

  8. #18
    BPnet Veteran Serpent_Nirvana's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-15-2009
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    842
    Thanks
    357
    Thanked 303 Times in 216 Posts

    Re: Is anyone working to try and produce a Pearl?

    Quote Originally Posted by joe23 View Post
    well it has no visual superform- thats right. but im 99,999% sure taht it is like i wrote before- breed a pin x pin gives u homozygous pinstripes- bread to a normal 100% of the babies are pins.

    ive read it in books and in reptile magazins, so im pretty sure that its correct.
    This is true (I think -- I believe someone has produced a homozygous pinstripe) except that the problem is that only 1/3 of the pinstripe-appearing offspring will be homozygous, and you can't tell which ones until they grow up and breed!

    So I can't really imagine wanting to do that breeding as 1/3 of your pinstripes are significantly more valuable than the other 2/3 ... But without knowing, you've just got to sell them all as "33% possible homozygous pinstripe," or what have you. (And if you were doing the breeding to hold one back, you've got a lot of work ahead of you proving the homozygous one out.)

    As far as the OP's question -- my guess is that if anyone is/was working to breed the lethal factor out of the pearl, it was the originator of the morph themselves (ie, NERD). If the lethal factor is inherent in the "HG woma" gene itself, then it can't be bred out, as others have said -- just like the "wobble" or the (theoretical) homozygous lethal factor can't be bred out of the spiders, either.

    If the lethal factor was just linked to the "HG woma" gene, then yes, after some outcrossing it could be bred out ... But if it is too tightly linked, that could be difficult to impossible, and if it was not all that closely linked, it probably would've been done by now.

  9. #19
    BPnet Lifer snakesRkewl's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-14-2009
    Location
    Milwaukie, Oregon
    Posts
    7,665
    Thanks
    2,687
    Thanked 3,036 Times in 2,147 Posts
    Images: 2

    Re: Is anyone working to try and produce a Pearl?

    Quote Originally Posted by joe23 View Post
    ive just checked serval genetic calculators- now im 100% sure about the hom. pinstripe!!!

    it is like i said...
    Only one person has ever claimed they thought their pinstripe was a homozygous animal(that I know of) that's one out of hundreds of thousands?
    Spider to spider is 75% spiders and 25% normals
    Pinstripe to pinstripe is the same....

    From the wizard...
    MALE: Pinstripe
    FEMALE: Pinstripe

    25%: Normal
    25%: Pinstripe
    25%: Pinstripe
    25%: Pinstripe
    Jerry Robertson

  10. #20
    BPnet Senior Member WingedWolfPsion's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-27-2007
    Location
    Plattsmouth, NE
    Posts
    5,168
    Thanks
    124
    Thanked 1,785 Times in 1,134 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: Is anyone working to try and produce a Pearl?

    The trouble is, pinstripe to pinstripe breedings are terrifically common, and when they do happen, it would take several years of breeding to really confirm that what you have is a homozygous pin, and not just great odds. I assumed no one was bothering--and if they DO bother, then they certainly aren't going to sell that animal. I wouldn't!

    Spider X spider has been done a lot with spider combos, and people have kept an eye out, but no super-spiders are in evidence.
    --Donna Fernstrom
    16.29 BPs in collection, 16.11 BP hatchlings
    Eclipse Exotics
    http://www.eclipseexotics.com/
    Author Website
    http://donnafernstrom.com
    Follow my Twitters: WingedWolfPsion, EclipseMeta, and EclipseExotics

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1