Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 866

2 members and 864 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,903
Threads: 249,097
Posts: 2,572,069
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, wkeith67
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: Infrared debate

Threaded View

  1. #2
    BPnet Lifer snakesRkewl's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-14-2009
    Location
    Milwaukie, Oregon
    Posts
    7,665
    Thanks
    2,687
    Thanked 3,036 Times in 2,147 Posts
    Images: 2

    Re: Infrared debate

    The light should be a secondary source of heat, not a primary.

    The UTH should be plugged into a thermostat, this is not an option, it's a must.
    With a thermostat you will be able to set your "ground temp" to 90-92 and then add your secondary heat source for getting your ambient temperature correct.

    A CHE is way better for this purpose, and last a lot longer too

    "Probably good to mention that I have a BLOOD python, not a ball."

    EDIT: *LOL, that sort of changes everything!*
    Last edited by snakesRkewl; 06-25-2010 at 02:57 PM.
    Jerry Robertson

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1