» Site Navigation
0 members and 1,544 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 76,078
Threads: 249,220
Posts: 2,572,813
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
|
-
Re: The Pine Debate
 Originally Posted by WingedWolfPsion
Or, to put it more simply, do you want to trust your female coral glow pied to a bedding that causes rats to wheeze and snuffle and die at half their usual lifespan?
All of my rats are kept on pine (pellets for adults, shavings for nursing moms and babies) - none wheeze or snuffle, and my oldest was almost four years old before she died. I personally have seen no negative effects of using pine bedding for any of my rodents. In addition, it cuts the smell much better than aspen does.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to rabernet For This Useful Post:
-
Re: The Pine Debate
I also keep many hundreds of rats on regular pine and have for 5+ years generation after generation with many of them as pets that are my wifes personal favorites. Never have had any respitory problems whatsoever.
Now what does cause respitory problems is keeping rodents in enclosed tanks with little ventilation caused by the the fumes from their constant peeing and pooping. The bedding is irrelevant. Some could very easily blame the bedding but the reality is they need cages with screened or grated tops that allow alot of air circulation.
I have seen several theories on the internet that are based on assumptions more than facts, for instance, dont feed in the enclosure because they will bite you whenever you open the cage. This is bunk but still is believed and preached passionately by many.
I am a fulltime newspaper guy for BP's now but have kept my kings on dried pine and aspen with the same results, perfectly fine.
I dont use dried pine on the rats (even hairless) and for many years and have never had any problems at all, ever.
For snakes I would say only dried pine and you are fine, rodents either one
-
The Following User Says Thank You to West Coast Jungle For This Useful Post:
-
Re: The Pine Debate
Sorry, I do not have faith. I have to stick with the science, personally.
People will have to make up their own minds which they prefer.
But I really disagree with advocating a potentially hazardous bedding choice.
It's amazing to me that you have rats with no respiratory problems at all--since they all carry mycoplasma. Unless you got yours from a special laboratory, delivered by C-section.
If you prefer to trust word of mouth over science...they're your critters, do it the way you want. Just make sure the people you are talking to know enough to make an informed decision about it for themselves.
-
-
Re: The Pine Debate
 Originally Posted by WingedWolfPsion
Sorry, I do not have faith. I have to stick with the science, personally.
People will have to make up their own minds which they prefer.
But I really disagree with advocating a potentially hazardous bedding choice.
It's amazing to me that you have rats with no respiratory problems at all--since they all carry mycoplasma. Unless you got yours from a special laboratory, delivered by C-section.
If you prefer to trust word of mouth over science...they're your critters, do it the way you want. Just make sure the people you are talking to know enough to make an informed decision about it for themselves.
Wingy, you got poo all over your shoe and you are tracking it on the rug. Go back out the front door and wipe it off on the lawn. We'll deal with the mess on the carpet.
Again, SCIENCE says that elevated liver enzymes doth not disease make.
SCIENCE shows us that aspen also contains phenols.
The only word of mouth being flopped about here is your strident claim that pine may be bad. You have not one shred of proof and worse, when people come forth and prove to you they've been using it on rats and snakes for decades with no issue, you go turtle. When it's shown that the some of the demi-gods of the snakedom use and recommend it, you go ostrich, and when you are finally backed into a corner you begin spewing nonsensical comments like the one quoted above. We call that going moonbat.
At the beginning of this thread I asked for proof. You are creating a mish-mash response from crappage strewn all over the wasteland of the internet.
See, I can Google the same JSTOR abstracts and the same BS pseudo-science detritus from a bunch of wanna-be biologists and grad students, barefoot and toothless rodent nuts and vomit it word for word here. Point is that the abstracts are the tip of the iceberg and the studies don't mean jack without an understanding of science and a full reading and understanding of the data.
To whit - the cornerstone of the "pine bad" argument is the elevated liver enzyme studies. I've seen too many people running around with that data in the air thinking it's a smoking gun. The problem with hacks is that they don't understand that elevated liver enzymes are a normal part of the detoxification process and unless a manifestation of liver disease is seen it means NOTHING. Smoking gun? More like a partially lit fart.
So enough with your full thread derailment. Crap or get off the pot. Where is your proof that pine bedding is harmful to reptiles? Where is your proof that an elevation of liver enzymes is (a) attributable to pine phenols and (b) that this elevation is a marker of future disease or a shortened lifespan?
Proof, Wingy. Show it or do us a favor and quietly exit the backdoor. You are doing nothing but propagating the same tired old BS bandied about on every snake site. I didn't ask for a rehash of every pine bedding rumor from the past five years, I asked for proof.
I will welcome proof and firsthand accounts of pine carnage. Your flip flops, back flips and mental cart wheels are amusing when it comes to politics, mildly irritating when it comes to social issues and down right hair rending when it comes to science. Embarrass yourself no further please.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Skiploder For This Useful Post:
BILLB OKC (06-10-2010),Buttons (06-10-2010)
-
Re: The Pine Debate
 Originally Posted by rabernet
All of my rats are kept on pine (pellets for adults, shavings for nursing moms and babies) - none wheeze or snuffle, and my oldest was almost four years old before she died. I personally have seen no negative effects of using pine bedding for any of my rodents. In addition, it cuts the smell much better than aspen does.
 Originally Posted by West Coast Jungle
I also keep many hundreds of rats on regular pine and have for 5+ years generation after generation with many of them as pets that are my wifes personal favorites. Never have had any respitory problems whatsoever.
Now what does cause respitory problems is keeping rodents in enclosed tanks with little ventilation caused by the the fumes from their constant peeing and pooping. The bedding is irrelevant. Some could very easily blame the bedding but the reality is they need cages with screened or grated tops that allow alot of air circulation.
I have seen several theories on the internet that are based on assumptions more than facts, for instance, dont feed in the enclosure because they will bite you whenever you open the cage. This is bunk but still is believed and preached passionately by many.
I am a fulltime newspaper guy for BP's now but have kept my kings on dried pine and aspen with the same results, perfectly fine.
I dont use dried pine on the rats (even hairless) and for many years and have never had any problems at all, ever.
For snakes I would say only dried pine and you are fine, rodents either one 
 Originally Posted by wilomn
Your first sentence is a flat out lie. I've got over 100 adults here you can come listen to any time you like. They've never been on anything but pine. I've got to be 30 generations on pine.
You second sentence is pure balderdash. You may have studies to back it up but as has been said, kraplan isn't known for accuracy, honesty or intelligence. I've had pet rats live 3 or 4 years on pine.
Do you have ANY personal experience with it?
As far as your scientists and measurements go, I may not be going to that extreme but my snakes eat, breed, move, live long lives and have multiple generations all while living on pine from hatchling to old age. I have decades of experience with, as I said, thousands of snakes. My information, though it directly contradicts what you regurgitate, is true, accurate and time tested.
Look at the dozens of people who have come forward on this thread citing the horrors of pine bedding and it becomes obvious you three have all had rare streaks of luck.......
.......year after year after year after year........
-
-
Re: The Pine Debate
 Originally Posted by WingedWolfPsion
It's amazing to me that you have rats with no respiratory problems at all--since they all carry mycoplasma. Unless you got yours from a special laboratory, delivered by C-section.
It amazes you that mine don't wheeze and snuffle on pine because they all carry mycoplasma?
You argue that pine causes wheezes and snuffles (have you ever tried it with your rats?), but then in the next breath are amazed that mine do not on pine - because they all carry mycoplasma. By that argument, they would wheeze and snuffle on any bedding.
-
-
Re: The Pine Debate
Occasionally, one would expect it--most any immune challenge can trigger a myco flare up.
It's a compliment, actually--you must take excellent care of your rats to have avoided this.
Actually, I keep my rats on pine. I see a lot less snuffles since I stopped adding new animals to the colony, but I do spot some occasionally. I have 1 3/4 full racks of rats, though.
It's the most economical choice for rats, which are all fed off before they're a full year old anyhow. Scientific studies show that pine releases toxins--some individual animals will be able to withstand that better than others, so I'm not surprised that you get the occasional elderly rat, even on pine.
Last edited by WingedWolfPsion; 06-10-2010 at 05:19 PM.
-
-
Re: The Pine Debate
 Originally Posted by WingedWolfPsion
occasional elderly rat, even on pine.
Occasional? As in not very often? As in changing what someone else wrote to suit your side of the argument?
Well, that does seem to be all you have in your arsenal....
I may not be very smart, but what if I am?
Stinky says, "Women should be obscene but not heard." Stinky is one smart man.
www.humanewatch.org
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|