I could see this as she went and had sex with the guy, then once she's back home with the BOYFRIEND, suddenly it's all "Oh he forced me by.. intimidation.. and I didn't want to, but I did.."
I could also see where he could have done exactly what she says he did. She wiated a long time to report it, but then some victims wait a long time to report sexual crimes. Could this be a disgruntled woman, angry and regretting something she did of her own free will? Or could it be a pushy aggressive guy who saw a woman he could coarce into sex?
I don't know either of the people involved. No one knows the truth, or where in the middle of all this the truth lies. Were the animals in really bad conditions? Were the animals in proper conditions and it's misreported because the people don't understand proper husbandry? Insuffient ventilation? What? He didn't have a commercial vent fan to raise rats.. or the rats were all kept in ziploc containers? The rats didn't have space to move? How exactly do you pack live rats into a holding bin so tight that they can't move, but they aren't all dead within minutes from overheating and suffacation?

Why is there so many spelling, grammer and other errors in the report? I don't mean the occasional typo, but there's a lot of errors, including one tense error that changes the meaning of the sentance to say he didn't do wrong, when it's obvious it's suposed to say he did do wrong.

If he did wrong, then I hope he's convicted and punished. If he did not do wrong, then I hope he's cleared of all charges. Since I wasn't there, and didn't see, I don't know.