Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 704

0 members and 704 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,899
Threads: 249,097
Posts: 2,572,069
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, wkeith67
Results 1 to 10 of 72

Threaded View

  1. #10
    BPnet Lifer mainbutter's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-30-2008
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    5,690
    Thanks
    269
    Thanked 1,374 Times in 1,053 Posts
    Images: 7

    Re: im not bashing venomous snake owners but...

    Quote Originally Posted by jzoot3d View Post
    Buh what is a sexier than a monocled cobra?
    A spectacled cobra

    These guys pretty much hit it on the head.

    Herpetoculture is all about experiencing reptiles and amphibians. It's about caring for, raising, keeping, and propogating these creatures. Just because an animal is dangerous doesn't make it no longer worthy of experiencing, it just means those experiences must be much more controlled than draping your corn snake across your forearm.

    There is no difference in the questions:
    "why would you keep reptiles?"
    "why would you keep snakes?"
    "why would you keep venomous snakes?"
    "why would you keep monitors?"
    "why would you keep frogs?"
    "why would you keep caimans?"
    "why would you keep alligator snapping turtles?"

    The answer is all the same, even if some pose various degrees of danger, or are less suitable for handling than other species.
    Last edited by mainbutter; 05-08-2010 at 03:35 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1