Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,165

2 members and 1,163 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,928
Threads: 249,128
Posts: 2,572,274
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, arushing027
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Threaded View

  1. #8
    in evinco persecutus dr del's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-20-2006
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    24,527
    Thanks
    9,263
    Thanked 6,788 Times in 4,306 Posts
    Images: 93

    Re: What to add to my collection???

    Hi,

    In this case I think compatible can be defined as producing a visually distinct animal with only one gene from each line. Thats not really a correct explanation though - just the simplest way of thinking about it I can come up with.

    If the OP has a VPI line axanthic het and buys another het axanthic that turns out to be from the snake keeper line then breeding them together will never give him a visually axanthic animal but instead give him a clutch of "33% possible double hets".

    Breeding the possible double hets together could give him visuals of both types of axanthic, an animal what visually expressed both lines of axanthic (not sure how that would look ) and normal looking animals.

    Genetically the normals would be "possible double hets", the single line visuals would be poss hets for the other line and the only animal whos genetics wouldn't be in doubt without further breeding would be the double homozygous dual line animal. ( I tried to work out the percentages but had a brain fart so gave up ).

    Er... I think.

    It could take him 6 - 10 years or more to feel confident that he knew the genetics of each animal from the first and second clutches. And even then he might never be certain.

    This is why everyone is stressing the problem with buying anything aside from a visual axanthic to pair with his original het axanthic - if he did end uo with different lines then he could at least say the result of the breding was 100% het for the line the visual parent came from.

    Now did that help or have I confused you as much as I have myself?


    dr del
    Last edited by dr del; 04-08-2010 at 01:22 PM. Reason: Realized I had percentages wrong - but can't think of the right ones
    Derek

    7 adult Royals (2.5), 1.0 COS Pastel, 1.0 Enchi, 1.1 Lesser platty Royal python, 1.1 Black pastel Royal python, 0.1 Blue eyed leucistic ( Super lesser), 0.1 Piebald Royal python, 1.0 Sinaloan milk snake 1.0 crested gecko and 1 bad case of ETS. no wife, no surprise.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1