Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 686

0 members and 686 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,110
Posts: 2,572,153
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 40
  1. #11
    BPnet Lifer mainbutter's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-30-2008
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    5,690
    Thanks
    269
    Thanked 1,374 Times in 1,053 Posts
    Images: 7

    Re: Lavender x candy = compatible?!

    Quote Originally Posted by jkobylka View Post
    I agree with BG, seeing how differently they look, I can't imagine that they would be compatible.
    I agree, but then again we get things like lessers, russos, and phantoms all being compatible, so I never make assumptions.

    I only make intelligent, informed guesses, and my guess is the same as above.

  2. #12
    BPnet Veteran Blue Apple Herps's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-21-2007
    Location
    Denton TX
    Posts
    2,456
    Thanks
    289
    Thanked 529 Times in 387 Posts

    Re: Lavender x candy = compatible?!

    Quote Originally Posted by jkobylka View Post
    I agree with BG, seeing how differently they look, I can't imagine that they would be compatible.

    Would love to see someone do the pairing just to have the data, but seeing how they are likely to produce dbl hets, I think most ppl will keep them separate.

    Justin
    I agree. But you never know. I think that enough of the BEL complex morphs look fairly different that you might not think they're compatible if you didn't know better.

  3. #13
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    08-18-2008
    Posts
    2,754
    Thanks
    710
    Thanked 737 Times in 457 Posts

    Re: Lavender x candy = compatible?!

    Someone actually called me yesterday and asked if I heard about it, and I promptly reminded them that it's April Fool's day, that quickly ended that discussion...

  4. #14
    BPnet Senior Member
    Join Date
    07-27-2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    2,522
    Thanks
    827
    Thanked 708 Times in 504 Posts
    Images: 29

    Re: Lavender x candy = compatible?!

    I'm betting on double hets. Because it'd be awesome to be wrong.
    -Jackie Monk

  5. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    06-15-2007
    Location
    Home
    Posts
    2,566
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 570 Times in 358 Posts
    Images: 12

    Re: Lavender x candy = compatible?!

    Quote Originally Posted by Tracy Barker View Post
    Tracy thinks there is a conspiracy theory going on...she thinks posts being pulled means somethings up! I imagine if a lavender albino x Candy/Toffee baby is nice-a lavender x Ultramel will be crazy!
    Haha....BG will give you a haha on this post.


    Here's what BG has to say.

    Did you ever see the Friends episode where Ross cheated on Rachel? (not really they were on a break) Well in the episode Joey(think it was Joey) asked him if he "followed the trail". You know....follow the trail of everyone that knows to see if it will get back to Rachel. He followed the trail and it led him to the leeetle weasel bartender that blew his cover.

    OK...wtf is BG talking about?

    Well...lets "follow the trail".

    There are only two people that could have sold anyone 100% hets from this project. It is known who these people are. The number of people that could have done this is low. If one of these people had actually done this(proved compatible)...who do you think the first person they would call would be(those 2 people that sold them and BG happens to know both very well)? It doesn't say Toffee...it says Candy....so this rules out Toffee hets.

    This isn't the only reason BG believes the post is bull. He has another, but won't say because it will get misconstrued.

    BG will say this though. If it was true, BG would look to be more of a genius than he already is. Someone "in the know" can figure out why that is.

    There's no names here. Why?????.....because the 2 people that sold the hets can say whether or not it's possible to make that claim. They know where the hets are.

    You rookies need to realize. It's the same old thing in this bizz. BG deals with it all the time. "Follow the trail" peeps. Now all you detectives out there. Let's do some detective work. Find out who Dtolley is that made the post...and let's "follow the trail". If it's true, the trail should be easy to follow right?

  6. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    06-15-2007
    Location
    Home
    Posts
    2,566
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 570 Times in 358 Posts
    Images: 12

    Re: Lavender x candy = compatible?!

    Ahhhh...what the heck. BG will let it get "misconstrued". Somehow BG believes that if someone did actually prove them compatible....they would keep it to themselves. There's just too much money to be lost by saying they are. Money that this person would have had to of spent on their hets.

    BG actually has one more thing he can add, but it's another that could be "misconstrued".

  7. #17
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    07-20-2006
    Posts
    1,305
    Thanks
    143
    Thanked 265 Times in 77 Posts
    Images: 20

    Re: Lavender x candy = compatible?!

    Well Neil I am breeding a het Toffee male to a Het lavender female so we shall see if I get something new and different. Lord knows I will tell the world and I have a lot of money to lose by doing so! But I know it will make you squirm!

    Brock

  8. #18
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    02-22-2006
    Posts
    284
    Thanks
    74
    Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
    Images: 13

    Re: Lavender x candy = compatible?!

    I am sure the two in the know with the candy would not come out and say the Candy and Lavs are compatible. It would make the 5000 grand het candys worth $500. Like the het lavs are. They would lose to much money.
    __________________
    Its hard kissing those lips at night that chew my butt all day!



    Thomas Jones

  9. #19
    BPnet Veteran pavlovk1025's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-09-2009
    Location
    SLC UT
    Posts
    1,721
    Thanks
    113
    Thanked 354 Times in 280 Posts
    Images: 16

    Re: Lavender x candy = compatible?!

    Quote Originally Posted by Thomas Jones View Post
    I am sure the two in the know with the candy would not come out and say the Candy and Lavs are compatible. It would make the 5000 grand het candys worth $500. Like the het lavs are. They would lose to much money.
    Pfft where are you gettin your het lavs then? A female het lav BABY will run you almost 3x times that. I know, I bought mine out the egg from Mr. Kobylka himself.

    Im going to go with they're not compatible. And I pray they're not compatible. Not to save their value, but because there is hardly anything out there that compares to the visual delight that is a Candy.
    ]

  10. #20
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    03-21-2010
    Location
    Roosevelt, Utah
    Posts
    1,123
    Thanks
    152
    Thanked 267 Times in 193 Posts
    Images: 303

    Re: Lavender x candy = compatible?!

    Sorry for the dumb question, but what would compatible here mean?

    Clark guesses that it is that they produce the same clutch odds.... or something.. ( BG) -- Clark loves to read BG's third person posts.
    Lots of BPs, and still not enough!

    https://www.facebook.com/selectmorphs

    This is addictive...what did I get myself into?...

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1