i don't think we should up and picket this study. it is being done with wild caught burms from the glades. this study could prove that the media hype about the "python invasion" isn't as big as a threat as some are making it out to be.
would you rather a couple of these animals be used for some data to help our community rather than them being killed for no use? at the very least, these animals are being used to help us.
I agree with this. If this proves that all this python propaganda is overblown and helps our hobby why should we complain about this. Like stated its a few wild caught burms that would be chopped up anyway.
Last edited by dr del; 03-31-2010 at 05:10 PM.
Reason: replacing censored words with italicised alternatives
i just gave an example BG. they do it for more than just crabs.
BG is just busting your chops...like always.
Originally Posted by djansen
I agree with this. If this proves that all this python propaganda is overblown and helps our hobby why should we complain about this. Like stated its a few wild caught burms that would be chopped up anyway.
Big Gunns is against them being "chopped up" also.
He does think that this study may help us, and he's not totally against the microchipping of animals to see if they will live. There is however a couple(BG needs to find them) studies where snakes are being left out to see if they'll freeze. BG's just making the point that they would never do it with dogs or cats.
Here is more on it. You need to read all the pages. BG isn't done with them all yet, but it does look like they're in a pit and can't escape. At least one person in the article knows they'll die. We need to find out if they let them die. BG doesn't like it if they did, but it would help us. Then we can go after them for animal cruelty.
Somebody from USArk and the like need to find out if this guy is gonna give his true results or not. BG has heard nothing of the results of this "experiment".
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Lucas339
