Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,115

0 members and 1,115 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,945
Threads: 249,141
Posts: 2,572,335
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, SONOMANOODLES
Results 1 to 10 of 52

Threaded View

  1. #16
    Broken down old dude dsirkle's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-15-2007
    Location
    Plymouth Twp Michigan
    Posts
    4,745
    Thanks
    481
    Thanked 988 Times in 649 Posts
    Images: 31

    Re: Hr2811 Good News

    Quote Originally Posted by WingedWolfPsion View Post
    Ok, guys--this is simple.

    The bill seeks to add these snakes to the LIST OF INJURIOUS WILDLIFE. THAT is what you need to pay attention to. The Lacey Act.
    Injurious wildlife cannot be transported across state lines. So it doesn't matter whether this bill mentions interstate transport specifically or not.

    Don't let them hoodwink you. Injurious wildlife is barred from interstate transport.
    Here is a link to substantiate this. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ht...000-notes.html “(A) Injurious animal.—The term ‘injurious animal’ means an animal the importation or interstate shipment of which is prohibited by section 42 of title 18, United States Code.
    Last edited by dsirkle; 03-03-2010 at 03:51 AM.
    Do not resuscitate

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1