Fascinating read, though I would have liked to hear more about how long that particular species was. I'd imagine it was huge if it was eating neonate sauropods (the article seemed to be trying to imply it could have been large enough to potentially eat much larger ones, but I highly doubt that). Thanks for the article.
Neonate sauropods could be surprisingly tiny - hatchling skeletons at Auca Mahuevo in Argentina would have been about 15" long - and a lot of that is neck and tail.
Neonate sauropods could be surprisingly tiny - hatchling skeletons at Auca Mahuevo in Argentina would have been about 15" long - and a lot of that is neck and tail.
Still, a very, _very_ cool discovery!
~Bruce
Wow, I wasn't aware of that. A lot of my knowledge of dinosaurs comes from the early 90's, so it's a bit outdated. That'd be some serious growth though.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by BrucenBruce
