Did anyone catch this?

They talked about how all of the irresponsible pet owners were driving down one main park road to release their burms. They never even once cited the occurrence of Hurricane Andrew. At least MonsterQuest did that. NatGeo placed all of the blame on keepers and pet owners for the python's introduction even despite the complete lack of evidence for this. They showed Rodda's USGS map, saying pythons could spread from San Francisco to Washington D.C. There was an interesting bit with a controlled experiment on hatchling burms in a USGS lab to see whether they can "survive" in salt and brackish water for extended periods of time, as a way to see whether the burms could swim out and survive among the FL Keys. One of the USGS "scientists" even said "we know so little about them that we are not even sure if they drink". They were also showing setting out baited traps in the Everglades to try to catch the pythons. It is funny how they speculated that there were 10's of thousands in the everglades, but all they caught were rats, toads, a cottonmouth, and ONE python. :lol:

They had a part with the burms in the outdoor enclosure in SC, and when fall/winter came around, they were showing the pythons climbing up to the tops of the trees in the pen and I quote from the show "Are they attempting to thermoregulate, or ARE THEY ADAPTING?" they even said that the pythons can survive freezing temperatures "just fine". Obviously, Florida's recent freeze was "conveniently" left out. I Wonder why. They also bought up the Burm/Afrock hybridizing but again conveniently left out the fact that the offspring would likely be sterile.

There was really only a 5 second blurb about us being "upset about the legislation". That was it. It was really nothing more than a pathetic half hearted attempt at trying to make their program look "fair and balanced". The show was pretty much what I expected it to be: complete Burm crap.