Everyone is obviously entitled to do what they feel is in their own best interest.
Personally, based on my experience fighting HR669, HR2811, & S373 on Capitol Hill and working with USFWS for the last 10 months, I'd recommend sending one polite, brief email explaining your objections to an injurious listing for each of these species and how an injurious listing would negatively effect you personally. The comment period will be opened up via the Federal Register in a couple of weeks and we'll all have an additional opportunity to provide on the record comments at that time as well.
Unlike politicians, USFWS scientists aren't elected. Thousands of people emailing them every day saying the same thing will not do much to sway their findings one way or the other. I know that PIJAC met with USFWS yesterday and I met with USFWS this morning and they are very open and willing to work with us to find the best possible solution. My concern is that a constant and steady email campaign from people saying the same thing day in and day out will turn them off and unsettle what looks to be a very positive process going forward.
Additionally, this is going to be a LONG process. The comment period alone will be 60 days before they even get started on the work that they will need to do in order to make their final decision.
I'm confident that looking to the leadership provided by PIJAC and USARK on this issue will help to achieve the greatest possible positive result.
I know that everyone wants to do what they can to help, but the battle just took a 180 degree turn and the guys & gals in the trenches are working on adjustments as we speak. Guidance is coming soon and it will be designed to not only get people involved so that they can be heard, but to make sure all of the "behind the scenes" negotiations continue as smoothly as possible.
I will do everything I can to pass the word as I get it.
Hope this helps.
-adam
Reply With Quote