Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 947

2 members and 945 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,107
Posts: 2,572,123
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11
    BPnet Veteran Serpents_Den's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-10-2004
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    846
    Thanks
    578
    Thanked 369 Times in 198 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: New York Anti-Reptile Bill A07935

    When they say wild animal/reptile I'm assuming they mean captive bred as well. Felony charges for having reptiles, what's happening to this country?

  2. #12
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    01-30-2009
    Posts
    6,112
    Thanks
    1,163
    Thanked 1,689 Times in 1,200 Posts
    Images: 4

    Re: New York Anti-Reptile Bill A07935

    Quote Originally Posted by redpython View Post
    Then guess what, if you truly believed that, then you would own ZERO snakes. Think about it, every snake you, i, or anyone else owns has wild origins.

    Collecting "usually" isn't the problem, yes of course it can be overdone, but the big problem is habitat destruction.

    When they clear that land for that strip mall or housing division, guess what...no more habitat for the snakes = no more snakes.
    Me owning Pythons has nothing to do with the US problem. But like you just stated they have wild in them from ancestors years ago. Im talking about taking a animal directly from the wild that was born and raised wild. They should remain there.

    We cant go based off what other countries do, this is our native animals to protect and leave be.

  3. #13
    BPnet Veteran redpython's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-28-2008
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    858
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 122 Times in 93 Posts
    Images: 6

    Re: New York Anti-Reptile Bill A07935

    so you think it's ok, in your opinion to collect wild animals from somewhere other than the united states? but it's not ok to do it in the united states?

    This seems like hypocritical thinking, because you owning pythons may have something to do w/ the african "problem."

    As long as populations are healthy, collect away. To some people having true locality animals is worth more than the craziest genetic mutations out there.








    Quote Originally Posted by flameethrower View Post
    Me owning Pythons has nothing to do with the US problem. But like you just stated they have wild in them from ancestors years ago. Im talking about taking a animal directly from the wild that was born and raised wild. They should remain there.

    We cant go based off what other countries do, this is our native animals to protect and leave be.

  4. #14
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    09-14-2007
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    3,250
    Thanks
    170
    Thanked 703 Times in 538 Posts

    Re: New York Anti-Reptile Bill A07935

    I'm not familiar enough with the details of the black-footed ferrets to speak on that one. But I do know there are numerous species of animals that are completely extinct in the wild, and still exist only due to captive breeding. In lots of cases, it is captive breeding done in accredited zoos, but in others it is due to private keepers. There are at least a few examples where captive breeding programs have allowed animals to be successfully reestablished in the wild.
    Casey

  5. #15
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    08-01-2006
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,583
    Thanks
    64
    Thanked 82 Times in 61 Posts

    Re: New York Anti-Reptile Bill A07935

    Quote Originally Posted by redpython View Post
    "If Herpetoculturist were around, dinosaurs wouldn't be extinct."

    Ooh, I LIKE that!

    The same goes for fish. Most Victorian cichlid species are extinct in the wild due to habitat desctruction. They live on in the tanks of hobbyists all over the world!
    Augie 1.0.0 Lemon Pastel BP
    Rio 1.0.0 South Brazilian BCA
    Blaze 0.1.0 Brazilian Rainbow Boa

  6. #16
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    08-01-2006
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,583
    Thanks
    64
    Thanked 82 Times in 61 Posts

    Re: New York Anti-Reptile Bill A07935

    I have to assume that since they cited the chimp attack in CT that they are NOT talking about native animals captured from the wild. It's hard to tell exactly what they ARE talking about from the language used.
    Augie 1.0.0 Lemon Pastel BP
    Rio 1.0.0 South Brazilian BCA
    Blaze 0.1.0 Brazilian Rainbow Boa

  7. #17
    BPnet Lifer Skiploder's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-03-2007
    Location
    Under a pile of wood.
    Posts
    3,580
    Thanks
    113
    Thanked 3,727 Times in 1,257 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: New York Anti-Reptile Bill A07935

    Existing law:

    § 370. Protection of the public from attack by wild animals and reptiles

    Any person owning, possessing or harboring a wild animal or reptile capable of inflicting bodily harm upon a human being, who shall fail to exercise due care in safeguarding the public from attack by such wild animal or reptile, is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment for not more than one year, or by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars, or by both. "Wild animal" within the meaning of this section, shall not include a dog or cat or other domestic animal.
    Previous attacks upon a human being by such wild animal or reptile, or knowledge of the vicious propensities of such wild animal or reptile, on the part of the possessor or harborer thereof, shall not be required to be proven by the people upon a prosecution hereunder; and neither the fact that such wild animal or reptile has not previously attacked a human being, nor lack of knowledge of the vicious propensities of such wild animal or reptile on the part of the owner, possessor or harborer thereof shall constitute a defense to a prosecution hereunder.

    CREDIT(S)

    (Added L.1965 c. 1047, § 3.)



    Further definitions - to wit, adding reptiles as defined below to the existing law noted above:

    http://law.onecle.com/new-york/envir...3_11-0103.html

    or if you're too lazy to look it up:


    (5) All reptiles that are venomous by nature, pursuant to department regulation, and the following species and orders: Burmese Python (Python m. bivittatus), Reticulated Python (Python reticulatus), African Rock Python (Python sabae), Green Anaconda (Eunectes maurinus), Yellow Anaconda (Eunectes notaeus), Australian Amethystine Python (Morelia amethistina and Morelia kinghorni), Indian Python (Python molurus), Asiatic (water) Monitor (Varanus salvator), Nile Monitor (Varanus nilocitus), White Throat Monitor (Varanus albigularis), Black Throat Monitor (Varanus albigularis ionides) and Crocodile Monitor (Varanus salvadori), Komodo Dragon (Varanus komodensis) and any hybrid thereof,

    (6) Crocodylia.



    Get it?

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Skiploder For This Useful Post:

    fishmommy (01-20-2010)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1