Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 995

0 members and 995 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

» Stats

Members: 75,948
Threads: 249,146
Posts: 2,572,383
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, EL SING
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Threaded View

  1. #7
    BPnet Veteran olstyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-10-2009
    Location
    Twin Cities, MN
    Posts
    669
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 208 Times in 155 Posts
    Images: 3

    Re: Snake seizeure in washington

    Hm, if it's illegal to keep venomous and crocodilians, then one wonders what the wait is to "sort out the legalities." Just charge the guy with illegal possession and be done with it. On a separate note, why confiscate the retic and the other nonvenomous snakes? It doesn't sound like those were a violation, apart from potentially falling under the catch all "but not limited to" clause in that statute. For that matter, "various species of venomous snakes" is pretty vague, too. You'd think that would have been written "all species of venomous snakes" or have referenced a list of permitted vs illegal animals. It sure seems like the laws in this country could use a serious review, with anything vague, unclear, or ridiculous being rewritten or repealed, as appropriate.
    Mountain bikes are for slow people, and reptiles are far better pets than cats & dogs!

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to olstyn For This Useful Post:

    rellek (01-15-2010)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1